These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27064964)

  • 1. Tracking the truth: the effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP; Vrij A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):930-943. PubMed ID: 27064964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye spy a liar: assessing the utility of eye fixations and confidence judgments for detecting concealed recognition of faces, scenes and objects.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 32797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.
    Schwedes C; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 22194248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aberrant first fixations when looking at inverted faces in various poses: the result of the centre-of-gravity effect?
    Hills PJ; Sullivan AJ; Pake JM
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23034110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of eye movements over faces in photographic positives and negatives.
    Luria SM; Strauss MS
    Perception; 2013; 42(11):1134-43. PubMed ID: 24601026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning.
    Sekiguchi T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21354541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study.
    Bhatt S; Mbwana J; Adeyemo A; Sawyer A; Hailu A; Vanmeter J
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 18848742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Through the eyes to memory: Fixation durations as an early indirect index of concealed knowledge.
    Schwedes C; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1244-1258. PubMed ID: 27380497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search.
    Greene HH; Rayner K
    Vision Res; 2001 Dec; 41(27):3763-73. PubMed ID: 11712988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: evidence from eye-tracking data.
    Saether L; Van Belle W; Laeng B; Brennen T; Øvervoll M
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2870-80. PubMed ID: 19733582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: an ERP investigation of newly learned faces.
    Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1356():54-72. PubMed ID: 20673756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.
    Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):658-67. PubMed ID: 19702419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the memory mechanism: person-selective and nonselective processes in recognition of personally familiar faces.
    Sugiura M; Mano Y; Sasaki A; Sadato N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):699-715. PubMed ID: 20350171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the durability of incidentally learned trust from gaze cues.
    Strachan JW; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2060-2075. PubMed ID: 27494048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.