These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27065252)
1. Genomic heritabilities and genomic estimated breeding values for methane traits in Angus cattle. Hayes BJ; Donoghue KA; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bird-Gardiner T; Herd RM; Arthur PF J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):902-8. PubMed ID: 27065252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomewide association study of methane emissions in Angus beef cattle with validation in dairy cattle. Manzanilla-Pech CI; De Haas Y; Hayes BJ; Veerkamp RF; Khansefid M; Donoghue KA; Arthur PF; Pryce JE J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4151-4166. PubMed ID: 27898855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits. Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle. Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population. Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic parameters for methane emission traits in Australian dairy cows. Richardson CM; Nguyen TTT; Abdelsayed M; Moate PJ; Williams SRO; Chud TCS; Schenkel FS; Goddard ME; van den Berg I; Cocks BG; Marett LC; Wales WJ; Pryce JE J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):539-549. PubMed ID: 33131823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes. Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes. Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. Haas Yd; Windig JJ; Calus MP; Dijkstra J; Haan Md; Bannink A; Veerkamp RF J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6122-34. PubMed ID: 22118100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for methane emission and postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Donoghue KA; Bird-Gardiner T; Arthur PF; Herd RM; Hegarty RF J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1438-45. PubMed ID: 27136003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle. Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and laser methane detector measurements. Pickering NK; Chagunda MG; Banos G; Mrode R; McEwan JC; Wall E J Anim Sci; 2015 Jan; 93(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 25403186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle. Cardoso FF; Matika O; Djikeng A; Mapholi N; Burrow HM; Yokoo MJI; Campos GS; Gulias-Gomes CC; Riggio V; Pong-Wong R; Engle B; Porto-Neto L; Maiwashe A; Hayes BJ Front Immunol; 2021; 12():620847. PubMed ID: 34248929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle. Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth, and body composition traits in beef cattle. Herd RM; Arthur PF; Donoghue KA; Bird SH; Bird-Gardiner T; Hegarty RS J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):5267-74. PubMed ID: 25349368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation, prediction, and genetic analyses of daily methane emissions in dairy cattle. Yin T; Pinent T; Brügemann K; Simianer H; König S J Dairy Sci; 2015 Aug; 98(8):5748-62. PubMed ID: 26026753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]