420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27065253)
1. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical note: Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):2027-2031. PubMed ID: 33309381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the unified relationship matrix adjusted by breed-wise allele frequencies in genomic evaluation of a multibreed population.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Feb; 97(2):1117-27. PubMed ID: 24342683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The estimation of genomic relationships using breedwise allele frequencies among animals in multibreed populations.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5364-75. PubMed ID: 23769355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
