These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27065290)

  • 1. The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply: A unique public-private partnership for conducting research on the sustainability of animal housing systems using a multistakeholder approach.
    Mench JA; Swanson JC; Arnot C
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):1296-308. PubMed ID: 27065290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.
    Mench JA; Sumner DA; Rosen-Molina JT
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 21177465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Coalition for Sustainable Egg Supply project: An introduction.
    Swanson JC; Mench JA; Karcher D
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):473-4. PubMed ID: 25737565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.
    Sumner DA; Gow H; Hayes D; Matthews W; Norwood B; Rosen-Molina JT; Thurman W
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 21177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introduction--the Socially Sustainable Egg Production project.
    Swanson JC; Mench JA; Thompson PB
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):227-8. PubMed ID: 21177464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Swanson JC; Mench JA; Karcher DM; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 25737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration: valuing stakeholder input in setting priorities for socially sustainable egg production.
    Swanson JC; Lee Y; Thompson PB; Bawden R; Mench JA
    Poult Sci; 2011 Sep; 90(9):2110-21. PubMed ID: 21844279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
    Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the sustainability of egg production systems in The Netherlands.
    van Asselt ED; van Bussel LG; van Horne P; van der Voet H; van der Heijden GW; van der Fels-Klerx HJ
    Poult Sci; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1742-50. PubMed ID: 26049800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of egg farmers regarding the ban on conventional cages in the EU and their opinion of alternative layer housing systems in Flanders, Belgium.
    Stadig LM; Ampe BA; Van Gansbeke S; Van den Bogaert T; D'Haenens E; Heerkens JL; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Mar; 95(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 26574025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems.
    Ochs DS; Wolf CA; Widmar NJO; Bir C
    Poult Sci; 2018 Oct; 97(10):3390-3396. PubMed ID: 29878239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
    Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.
    Shepherd TA; Zhao Y; Li H; Stinn JP; Hayes MD; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 25737568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems.
    Fulton RM
    Avian Dis; 2019 Sep; 63(3):420-426. PubMed ID: 31967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey of egg producers on the introduction of alternative housing systems for laying hens in Flanders, Belgium.
    Tuyttens FA; Sonck B; Staes M; Van Gansbeke S; Van den Bogaert T; Ampe B
    Poult Sci; 2011 Apr; 90(4):941-50. PubMed ID: 21406383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Li H; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 25737567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Values and public acceptability dimensions of sustainable egg production.
    Thompson PB; Appleby M; Busch L; Kalof L; Miele M; Norwood BF; Pajor E
    Poult Sci; 2011 Sep; 90(9):2097-109. PubMed ID: 21844278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
    Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality.
    Guesdon V; Ahmed AM; Mallet S; Faure JM; Nys Y
    Br Poult Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16546790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symposium: Animal welfare challenges for today and tomorrow.
    Vizzier Thaxton Y; Christensen KD; Mench JA; Rumley ER; Daugherty C; Feinberg B; Parker M; Siegel P; Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2016 Sep; 95(9):2198-207. PubMed ID: 26994205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.