These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27067199)

  • 1. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
    Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus.
    Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index.
    Eun IS; Oh YS; Kim J; Jang W
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(1):33-35. PubMed ID: 37604317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Korean version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
    Suh KT; Kim JI; Lim JM; Goh TS; Lee JS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):447-50. PubMed ID: 22124429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
    Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders.
    Yagci G; Erel S; Okunakol V
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 31431327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index.
    Kim DY; Lee SH; Lee HY; Lee HJ; Chang SB; Chung SK; Kim HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):E123-7. PubMed ID: 15738775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders.
    Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B; Fırat N; Yıldız NT; Alkan A
    Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 48(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29914240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases.
    Martinelli N; Scotto GM; Sartorelli E; Bonifacini C; Bianchi A; Malerba F
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 23689933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints.
    Naal FD; Impellizzeri FM; Huber M; Rippstein PF
    Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1222-8. PubMed ID: 19138487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI).
    Pourtier-Piotte C; Pereira B; Soubrier M; Thomas E; Gerbaud L; Coudeyre E
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Oct; 58(5):276-82. PubMed ID: 26343763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translation and validation of the Danish Foot Function Index (FFI-DK).
    Jorgensen JE; Andreasen J; Rathleff MS
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Aug; 25(4):e408-13. PubMed ID: 25367744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index.
    Wu SH; Liang HW; Hou WH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 107(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 18285243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
    Angthong C
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): A clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI.
    Kuyvenhoven MM; Gorter KJ; Zuithoff P; Budiman-Mak E; Conrad KJ; Post MW
    J Rheumatol; 2002 May; 29(5):1023-8. PubMed ID: 12022318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.
    Kim JK; Kang JS
    J Hand Ther; 2013; 26(3):238-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 23453368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foot Function Index for Arabic-speaking patients (FFI-Ar): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.
    Khan S; Faulkner S; Algarni FS; Almalki A; Almansour A; Altowaijri AM
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):212. PubMed ID: 35392981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thai version of the foot function index: a cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluation.
    Bovonsunthonchai S; Thong-On S; Vachalathiti R; Intiravoranont W; Suwannarat S; Smith R
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2020; 12():56. PubMed ID: 32944253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
    Melikoglu MA; Kocabas H; Sezer I; Bilgilisoy M; Tuncer T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):E219-24. PubMed ID: 19282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.