1187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27067597)
1. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia.
Imerci A; Yalın Kılınç C; Aydogan NH; Karalezli MN; Savran A
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):464-471. PubMed ID: 28781230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between FRAX scores calculated with and without bone mineral density in women with osteopenia in Turkey.
Olmez Sarikaya N; Kapar Yavasi S; Tan G; Satiroglu S; Yildiz AH; Oz B; Yoleri O; Memis A
Clin Rheumatol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1785-9. PubMed ID: 24474067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The activity of a Spanish bone densitometry unit revisited under the point of view of FRAX.
Gómez-Vaquero C; Bianchi M; Santo P; Roig-Vilaseca D; Narváez J; Nolla JM
Reumatol Clin; 2012; 8(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 22608955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the validity of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment tools (IOF One Minute Test, SCORE, and FRAX) in postmenopausal Palestinian women.
Kharroubi A; Saba E; Ghannam I; Darwish H
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 28013446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture risk among treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Greece: results from the "ACROSS" study.
Anastasilakis AD; Makras P
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Oct; 15(1):163. PubMed ID: 33067646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and applicability of the FRAX tool in Joinville City, Southern Brazil.
Silva DMW; Borba VZC; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Dec; 12(1):111. PubMed ID: 29224172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone mass, fracture risk, and associated factors in postmenopausal women living with HIV.
Leite-Silva PR; Pinheiro RS; Barbosa-Ferreira JMB; Balieiro A; Sabidó M; Lacerda MVG; Chaves YO; Nogueira PA; Benzaken AS
Menopause; 2024 Jan; 31(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 38113435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk factors for bone mineral density changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fracture risk assessment].
Wang Y; Hao YJ; Deng XR; Li GT; Geng Y; Zhao J; Zhou W; Zhang ZL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Oct; 47(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 26474615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison fracture risk calculated by FRAX tool].
Carranza-Lira S; Lanuza-López MC; Sandoval-Barragán MP
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2014 Sep; 82(9):591-4. PubMed ID: 25412552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement of Mexican FRAX with and without the value of bone mineral density in assessing the risk of fracture in daily clinical practice.
Horta-Baas G; Pérez Bolde-Hernández A; Pérez-Pérez A; Vergara-Sánchez I; Romero-Figueroa MDS
Med Clin (Barc); 2017 May; 148(9):387-393. PubMed ID: 28118961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.
Zerbini CA; Szejnfeld VL; Abergaria BH; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2015; 10():224. PubMed ID: 26303038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimal intervention threshold of FRAX in postmenopausal Thai women.
Sribenjalak D; Charoensri S; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35072805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.
Hoff M; Meyer HE; Skurtveit S; Langhammer A; Søgaard AJ; Syversen U; Dhainaut A; Skovlund E; Abrahamsen B; Schei B
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Oct; 28(10):2935-2944. PubMed ID: 28668994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
