These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27067753)
1. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Range of Motion to Impingement Curves Create a New Patient-Specific Impingement-Free Zone for Acetabular Cup Placement. McCarthy TF; Thompson MT; Nevelos J; Salem HS; Naylor BH; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2021 May; 38():400-406. PubMed ID: 33565600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components. Widmer KH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study. Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH; Zurfluh B J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Transverse Acetabular Ligament as an Intraoperative Guide to Cup Abduction. Hiddema WB; van der Merwe JF; van der Merwe W J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1609-13. PubMed ID: 26897492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study. Eslam Pour A; Tung WS; Donnelley CA; Tommasini SM; Wiznia DH J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 36709882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty? Dennis DA; Smith GH; Phillips JLH; Ennis HE; Jennings JM; Plaskos C; Pierrepont JW J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S257-S264. PubMed ID: 37100096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement. Hisatome T; Doi H J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system. Tsuda K; Haraguchi K; Koyanagi J; Takahashi S; Sugama R; Fujiwara K Int Orthop; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2031-2039. PubMed ID: 26780716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?]. Widmer KH Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation. Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation. Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty]. Tian R; Lei Y; Wang K; Yang P Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 34651476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]