These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27067895)

  • 1. eLearning to facilitate the education and implementation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment: a novel measure of function in critical illness.
    Corner EJ; Handy JM; Brett SJ
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010614. PubMed ID: 27067895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study.
    Corner EJ; Wood H; Englebretsen C; Thomas A; Grant RL; Nikoletou D; Soni N
    Physiotherapy; 2013 Mar; 99(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 23219649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.
    Giray E; Turan Z; Öke D; Topaloğlu M; Baygul A; Curci C; de Sire A; Taskiran OO
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2023; 36(3):527-539. PubMed ID: 36617777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. German version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-GE): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.
    Eggmann S; Verra ML; Stefanicki V; Kindler A; Seyler D; Hilfiker R; Schefold JC; Bastiaenen CHG; Zante B
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 44(16):4509-4518. PubMed ID: 33874842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: a prospective clinimetric study.
    Eggmann S; Verra ML; Stefanicki V; Kindler A; Schefold JC; Zante B; Bastiaenen CHG
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 45(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 34994664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study.
    Corner EJ; Hichens LV; Attrill KM; Vizcaychipi MP; Brett SJ; Handy JM
    Burns; 2015 Mar; 41(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 25554262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinesisation, adaptation and validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional observational study.
    Zhang Z; Wang G; Wu Y; Guo J; Ding N; Jiang B; Wei H; Li B; Yue W; Tian J
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045550. PubMed ID: 33837104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability.
    Schanke CM; Brekka AK; Rimehaug SA; Klokkerud M; Andersen TM
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jul; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 37568435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-cultural adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the Swedish version of the Chelsea critical care assessment tool (CPAX-Swe) in critically ill patients.
    Holdar U; Eriksson F; Siesage K; Corner EJ; Ledström V; Svensson-Raskh A; Kierkegaard M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jun; 43(11):1600-1604. PubMed ID: 31558043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness.
    Corner EJ; Soni N; Handy JM; Brett SJ
    Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 18(2):R55. PubMed ID: 24669784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and responsiveness of the Danish version of The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx).
    Astrup K; Corner E; Van Tulder M; Sørensen L
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2023 Jan; 39(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 34784835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment (CPAx) tool on clinical outcomes of surgical and trauma patients in an intensive care unit: An experimental study.
    Whelan M; van Aswegen H; Corner E
    S Afr J Physiother; 2018; 74(1):450. PubMed ID: 30214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical function and activity of patients after open abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing the clinimetric properties of two outcome measures.
    Fourie M; van Aswegen H
    Physiotherapy; 2024 Jun; 123():142-150. PubMed ID: 38490073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool into Danish.
    Astrup K; Corner EJ; Hansen MG; Petersen AK
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 30499357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic tools of intensive care unit acquired weakness: a systematic review].
    Wu Y; Ding N; Jiang B; Zhang Z; Zhang C; Li B
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 30592950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring Physical Function in the PICU: Development and Testing of a Children's Version (Age 2-18 yr) of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool.
    Ferguson AH; Stockton KA; Wright SE; George JM; Fulton TJ; Stocker C; Long DA
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2024 May; 25(5):e239-e245. PubMed ID: 38695703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical Care Functional Rehabilitation Outcome Measure: developing a validated measure.
    Twose PW; Wise MP; Enright S
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2015; 31(7):474-82. PubMed ID: 26200435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional outcomes of patients in ICU using the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool: An integrative review.
    Tjale LC; Hanekom SG; Mshunqane N
    S Afr J Physiother; 2023; 79(1):1924. PubMed ID: 38059060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.
    Walsh CM; Ling SC; Khanna N; Grover SC; Yu JJ; Cooper MA; Yong E; Nguyen GC; May G; Walters TD; Reznick R; Rabeneck L; Carnahan H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1417-1424.e2. PubMed ID: 25753836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.