These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27068022)

  • 1. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
    Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
    Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
    Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
    Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
    Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
    Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of FitBit, Jawbone UP, Nike+ and other wearable devices for level and stair walking.
    Huang Y; Xu J; Yu B; Shull PB
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jul; 48():36-41. PubMed ID: 27477705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
    Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitors in Older Adults With Varied Ambulatory Abilities.
    Floegel TA; Florez-Pregonero A; Hekler EB; Buman MP
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 72(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 27257217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
    Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
    St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey A; Mavilia M; Tedesco J; John D; Kozey Keadle S; Freedson PS
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24770438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.
    Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.
    Magistro D; Brustio PR; Ivaldi M; Esliger DW; Zecca M; Rainoldi A; Boccia G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190753. PubMed ID: 29425196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
    Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry.
    Adam Noah J; Spierer DK; Gu J; Bronner S
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Oct; 37(7):456-62. PubMed ID: 24007317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites.
    Tudor-Locke C; Barreira TV; Schuna JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.