These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27068051)

  • 1. Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.
    Lin Z; Lu ZL; He S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2185-98. PubMed ID: 27068051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 27174735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 26420441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limits in feature-based attention to multiple colors.
    Liu T; Jigo M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2327-2337. PubMed ID: 28733839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.