These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27068312)

  • 1. Efficacy of a cone beam computed tomography metal artifact reduction algorithm for the detection of peri-implant fenestrations and dehiscences.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Peyneau PD; Ramirez-Sotelo LR; Vasconcelos Kde F; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 27068312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Vasconcelos Kde F; Neves FS; Melo SL; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23217543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant dehiscence defects by using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Bayrak S; Orhan K; Kursun Çakmak ES; Görürgöz C; Odabaşı O; Yilmaz D; Atakan C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 32197878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone-beam computed tomography on the diagnostic accuracy of fenestration and dehiscence around dental implants.
    Sheikhi M; Behfarnia P; Mostajabi M; Nasri N
    J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 31364765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Wanderley VA; Câmara JVF; Santos LA; Ferrari CR; Araujo TT; Chilvarquer I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Aug; 138(2):316-323. PubMed ID: 38493025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm and an adaptive image noise optimization filter in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Bagis N; Kurt MH; Evli C; Camgoz M; Atakan C; Peker Ozturk H; Orhan K
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jul; 38(3):325-335. PubMed ID: 34387842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancement cone beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection.
    de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Alencar PN; Rovaris K; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 24018127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F; Jamalpour MR; Eskandarloo A; Tapak L; Rahimi N
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Vasconcelos TV; Bechara BB; McMahan CA; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Feb; 123(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 28086998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm.
    Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Capel CP; da Motta RJG; Pauwels R; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Apr; 53(4):233-239. PubMed ID: 38466923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of metal artifact reduction algorithms in cone beam computed tomography images considering the effects of materials, metal positions, and fields of view.
    Vasconcelos KF; Codari M; Queiroz PM; Nicolielo LFP; Freitas DQ; Sforza C; Jacobs R; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 127(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 30528550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do metal artifact reduction algorithms influence the detection of implant-related injuries to the inferior alveolar canal in CBCT images?
    Soltani P; Devlin H; Etemadi Sh M; Rengo C; Spagnuolo G; Baghaei K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):268. PubMed ID: 38395919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of tube current and metal artifact reduction on the diagnosis of external cervical resorption in teeth adjacent to a dental implant in CBCT: an ex-vivo study.
    Gonzalez-Passos T; Barros-Costa M; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(6):356. PubMed ID: 38834721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters.
    Queiroz PM; Groppo FC; Oliveira ML; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jun; 123(6):729-734. PubMed ID: 28412235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the Milliamperage and Artifact Reduction Tool on the CBCT-Based Diagnosis of Buccal and Lingual Peri-implant Dehiscences: Comparison Between Two Types of Implants.
    Nascimento EHL; Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC; Fontenele RC; Gaêta-Araujo H; Moraes Ramos-Perez FM; Freitas DQ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1202-1209. PubMed ID: 36450026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Field of View and Acquisition Frame on the Detection of Chemically Simulated Peri-Implant Bone Loss In Vitro.
    Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; Augusto de Oliveira Sales M; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Cavalcanti MG
    J Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 86(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 26156676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study.
    Fontenele RC; Farias Gomes A; Nejaim Y; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2229-2235. PubMed ID: 32827079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.