These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27068542)

  • 1. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
    Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology.
    Coyne JC
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 27245324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?
    Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
    Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma's (2014) "Playing with Data".
    Waldman ID; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25820981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Registered reports and replications: An ongoing Journal of School Psychology initiative.
    Braden JP
    J Sch Psychol; 2024 Apr; 103():101294. PubMed ID: 38432736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
    Makel MC; Plucker JA; Hegarty B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 26168110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
    Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery.
    McElreath R; Smaldino PE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136088. PubMed ID: 26308448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jan; 13(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 34628722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ease of articulation: A replication.
    Shuster LI; Cottrill C
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 56():1-7. PubMed ID: 26071668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
    Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questionable research practices and cumulative science: The consequences of selective reporting on effect size bias and heterogeneity.
    Anderson SF; Liu X
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36951733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22351589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.