These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27068550)

  • 21. Can listeners hear how many singers are singing? The effect of listener's experience, vibrato, onset, and formant frequency on the perception of number of simultaneous singers.
    Erickson ML; Gaskill CS
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22921292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intelligibility of vowels sung by a countertenor.
    Gottfried TL; Chew SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 3944339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students.
    Lundy DS; Roy S; Casiano RR; Xue JW; Evans J
    J Voice; 2000 Dec; 14(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 11130107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual Differences between Novice and Professional Music Theater Singers.
    Maxfield L; Manternach B
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):572-577. PubMed ID: 28888666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objective Identification of Prepubertal Female Singers and Non-singers by Singing Power Ratio Using Matlab.
    Usha M; Geetha YV; Darshan YS
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):157-160. PubMed ID: 27481233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Singing power ratio: quantitative evaluation of singing voice quality.
    Omori K; Kacker A; Carroll LM; Riley WD; Blaugrund SM
    J Voice; 1996 Sep; 10(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 8865093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers.
    Arunachalam R; Boominathan P; Mahalingam S
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):128.e1-128.e9. PubMed ID: 24275462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term-average spectrum characteristics of country singers during speaking and singing.
    Cleveland TF; Sundberg J; Stone RE
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 12269635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Lombard effect in choral singing.
    Tonkinson S
    J Voice; 1994 Mar; 8(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8167784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Impact of Vocal Cool-down Exercises: A Subjective Study of Singers' and Listeners' Perceptions.
    Ragan K
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):764.e1-764.e9. PubMed ID: 26778328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurements of the Acoustic Speaking Voice After Vocal Warm-up and Cooldown in Choir Singers.
    Onofre F; Prado YA; Rojas GVE; Garcia DM; Aguiar-Ricz L
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):129.e9-129.e14. PubMed ID: 26774847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Singers' and Nonsingers' Perception of Vocal Vibrato.
    Reddy AA; Subramanian U
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 25795372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices.
    Brown WS; Rothman HB; Sapienza CM
    J Voice; 2000 Sep; 14(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 11021498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of fundamental frequency nasalance between trained singers and nonsingers for sung vowels.
    Fowler LP; Morris RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Oct; 116(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 17987779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Instrumental and perceptual evaluations of two related singers.
    Buder EH; Wolf T
    J Voice; 2003 Jun; 17(2):228-44. PubMed ID: 12825655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual, auditory and acoustic vocal analysis of speech and singing in choir conductors.
    Rehder MI; Behlau M
    Pro Fono; 2008; 20(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 18852968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Making myself understood: perceived factors affecting the intelligibility of sung text.
    Fine PA; Ginsborg J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():809. PubMed ID: 25249987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Melodic contour identification and sentence recognition using sung speech.
    Crew JD; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL347-51. PubMed ID: 26428838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.