These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2706888)

  • 1. [Picture quality of a digital urogram using image enhancement radiography].
    Scholz A; Langer M; Zwicker C; Felix R
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Mar; 9(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2706888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Digital image intensifier radiography--application in angiography, urography and bone diagnosis].
    Langer M; Zwicker C; Langer R; Scholz A; Hinz A; Eichstädt H; Mitsch E; Felix R
    Rofo; 1989 Jun; 150(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 2544953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience].
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 2377752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiology in renovascular hypertension from i.v. urography to digital subtraction angiography. A critical evaluation].
    Amiel M; Froment A; Pinet F; Huguet M
    J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 67(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 3806464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The diagnostic value of digital and conventional imaging in intravenous urography].
    Hundt C; Kohz P; Leinsinger G; Fink U; Schätzl M
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension using venous DSA (digital subtraction angiography): image quality and predictive value 1987. Determination of current status].
    Neufang KF; Degenhardt S; Mödder U
    Rofo; 1987 Sep; 147(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2823328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved visualization of the urinary tract in multidetector CT urography (MDCTU): analysis of individual acquisition delay and opacification using furosemide and low-dose test images.
    Kemper J; Regier M; Stork A; Adam G; Nolte-Ernsting C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(5):751-7. PubMed ID: 16954923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the hypertensive urogram a necessary examination?
    Lalli AF
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1981 Mar; 32(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 7217157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in diagnosing renovascular hypertension in 82 cases].
    Peng BR; Gu JP; Fan CY
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1988 Jun; 16(3):156-8, 189-90. PubMed ID: 3065023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of hypertension.
    Gomes AS; Pais SO; Barbaric ZL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Apr; 140(4):779-83. PubMed ID: 6340443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Excretion urogram with angiotomography sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis; a comparison with differences in renal size and contrast density on early films (author's transl)].
    Ingrisch H; Holzgreve H; Binder G; Frey KW
    Rofo; 1981 Apr; 134(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 6453062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography during excretory urography: our experience.
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2085269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypertensive urogram: a nondiscriminatory test for renovascular hypertension.
    Thornbury JR; Stanley JC; Fryback DG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 6976710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional renal angiography versus renal digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the study of renovascular hypertension.
    Essinger A; de Morsier B; Narbel M; Raimondi S
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1988; 31(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 3134841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intravenous digital subtraction renal angiography: use in screening for renovascular hypertension.
    Dunnick NR; Svetkey LP; Cohan RH; Newman GE; Braun SD; Himmelstein SI; Bollinger RR; McCann RL; Wilkinson RH; Klotman PE
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 2648471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intravenous urographic technique.
    Hattery RR; Williamson B; Hartman GW; LeRoy AJ; Witten DM
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):593-9. PubMed ID: 3363117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital urography using stimulable phosphor. An experimental study in the rabbit.
    Pettersson H; Aspelin P; Boijsen E
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 2968094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction arteriography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension.
    Campbell DR; Mason WF; Flemming BK; Fraser DB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 6365924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excretory urography using computed radiography.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Hunter TB; Claypool HR; Westerman BR; Mockbee B
    Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 3797646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.