These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27069048)

  • 21. The role of action prediction and inhibitory control for joint action coordination in toddlers.
    Meyer M; Bekkering H; Haartsen R; Stapel JC; Hunnius S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():203-20. PubMed ID: 26150055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Woźniak M; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():73-83. PubMed ID: 31153967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Human and macaque pairs employ different coordination strategies in a transparent decision game.
    Moeller S; Unakafov AM; Fischer J; Gail A; Treue S; Kagan I
    Elife; 2023 Jan; 12():. PubMed ID: 36633125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3- and 5-year-old children's adherence to explicit and implicit joint commitments.
    Kachel U; Tomasello M
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 55(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 30359057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
    Müller R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):464-86. PubMed ID: 25957279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions.
    Sacheli LM; Tidoni E; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM; Candidi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 226(4):473-86. PubMed ID: 23503771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The planning and execution of natural sequential actions in the preschool years.
    Freier L; Cooper RP; Mareschal D
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():58-66. PubMed ID: 26232585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of affiliation in the development of collaborative partner choice.
    Corbit J; MacDougall H; Hartlin S; Moore C
    Dev Psychol; 2024 Jul; 60(7):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 38546569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Avoiding Accidents at the Champagne Reception.
    Pezzulo G; Iodice P; Donnarumma F; Dindo H; Knoblich G
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Mar; 28(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 28103140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal Role of Motor Simulation in Turn-Taking Behavior.
    Hadley LV; Novembre G; Keller PE; Pickering MJ
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(50):16516-20. PubMed ID: 26674875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-Year-Olds' Reactions to a Partner's Failure to Perform Her Role in a Joint Commitment.
    Kachel U; Svetlova M; Tomasello M
    Child Dev; 2018 Sep; 89(5):1691-1703. PubMed ID: 28508396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of planning in 4- to 10-year-old children: reducing inhibitory demands does not improve performance.
    Tecwyn EC; Thorpe SK; Chappell J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Sep; 125():85-101. PubMed ID: 24858446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.
    Comalli DM; Keen R; Abraham ES; Foo VJ; Lee MH; Adolph KE
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1878-1892. PubMed ID: 27786531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Joint action changes valence-based action coding in an implicit attitude task.
    Stenzel A; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):889-903. PubMed ID: 26215432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action.
    Grynszpan O; Sahaï A; Hamidi N; Pacherie E; Berberian B; Roche L; Saint-Bauzel L
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102820. PubMed ID: 31561189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.
    Meyer M; van der Wel RP; Hunnius S
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 225(4):579-88. PubMed ID: 23361302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two Brains in Action: Joint-Action Coding in the Primate Frontal Cortex.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Visco-Comandini F; Battaglia-Mayer A
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(18):3514-3528. PubMed ID: 30804088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investing in commitment: Persistence in a joint action is enhanced by the perception of a partner's effort.
    Székely M; Michael J
    Cognition; 2018 May; 174():37-42. PubMed ID: 29407604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intentionality of a co-actor influences sensorimotor synchronisation with a virtual partner.
    Mills PF; Harry B; Stevens CJ; Knoblich G; Keller PE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1478-1492. PubMed ID: 30081732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task.
    van der Weiden A; Liepelt R; van Haren NEM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):842-851. PubMed ID: 28840393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.