These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27070236)

  • 1. Clinically Relevant Optical Properties of Bifocal, Trifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
    Gatinel D; Loicq J
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 32(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 27070236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform.
    Son HS; Tandogan T; Liebing S; Merz P; Choi CY; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):108. PubMed ID: 28662629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical performance of two new trifocal intraocular lenses: through-focus modulation transfer function and influence of pupil size.
    Ruiz-Alcocer J; Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 42(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 23927051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Through-Focus Optical Bench Performance of Extended Depth-of-Focus and Bifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to a Monofocal Lens.
    Yoo YS; Whang WJ; Byun YS; Piao JJ; Kim DY; Joo CK; Yoon G
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):236-243. PubMed ID: 29634838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory Evaluation of the Influence of Decentration and Pupil Size on the Optical Performance of a Monofocal, Bifocal, and Trifocal Intraocular Lens.
    Tandogan T; Son HS; Choi CY; Knorz MC; Auffarth GU; Khoramnia R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):808-812. PubMed ID: 29227508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Ferrer-Blasco T; Pons AM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):928-36. PubMed ID: 23688880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 29(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 24203806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of the optical properties of two extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.
    Chae SH; Son HS; Khoramnia R; Lee KH; Choi CY
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):53. PubMed ID: 32059666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Large Apertures on the Optical Quality of Three Multifocal Lenses.
    Esteve-Taboada JJ; Domínguez-Vicent A; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 31(10):666-76. PubMed ID: 26469074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical Performance of a Trifocal IOL and a Novel Extended Depth of Focus IOL Combined With Different Corneal Profiles.
    Ruiz-Alcocer J; Lorente-Velázquez A; Hernández-Verdejo JL; De Gracia P; Madrid-Costa D
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):435-441. PubMed ID: 32644165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench.
    Gatinel D; Houbrechts Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1093-9. PubMed ID: 23692884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total Depth of Focus of Five Premium Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.
    Zapata-Díaz JF; Rodríguez-Izquierdo MA; Ould-Amer N; Lajara-Blesa J; López-Gil N
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 36(9):578-584. PubMed ID: 32901824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [
    Du QX; Liu XM; Ma WH; Huang YS
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 60(6):494-502. PubMed ID: 38679584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Optical quality of three trifocal intraocular lens models : An optical bench comparison].
    Khoramnia R; Yildirim TM; Tandogan T; Liebing S; Łabuz G; Choi CY; Auffarth G
    Ophthalmologe; 2018 Jan; 115(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 28956141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compromise between spherical and chromatic aberration and depth of focus in aspheric intraocular lenses.
    Franchini A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):497-509. PubMed ID: 17321402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the optical performance of intraocular lenses using profilometric measurements.
    Miret JJ; Camps VJ; García C; Caballero MT; Gonzalez-Leal JM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39287656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 254(7):1387-97. PubMed ID: 26671689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses.
    Carson D; Xu Z; Alexander E; Choi M; Zhao Z; Hong X
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 27697256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerance to decentration of biaspheric intraocular lenses with refractive phase-ring extended depth of focus and diffractive trifocal designs.
    Cerviño A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Chiu YF; Yang CH; Tseng WC; Lee W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 262(8):2541-2550. PubMed ID: 38526773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging quality of bifocal piggyback intraocular lens versus ReSTOR and TECNIS multifocal lenses.
    Artigas JM; Felipe A; Diaz-Llopis M; Garcia-Delpech S; Navea A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19882520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.