These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27071180)

  • 1. Kalman Filter Based Estimation of Auditory Steady State Response Parameters.
    Luke R; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 27071180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced Auditory Steady-State Response Using an Optimized Chirp Stimulus-Evoked Paradigm.
    Liu X; Liu S; Guo D; Sheng Y; Ke Y; An X; He F; Ming D
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30759874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Luke R; De Vos A; Wouters J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():568-576. PubMed ID: 27894891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatiotemporal reconstruction of auditory steady-state responses to acoustic amplitude modulations: Potential sources beyond the auditory pathway.
    Farahani ED; Goossens T; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Neuroimage; 2017 Mar; 148():240-253. PubMed ID: 28110090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bayesian approach to the spectral F-Test: Application to auditory steady-state responses.
    Romao M; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jan; 183():105100. PubMed ID: 31622797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent component analysis for cochlear implant artifacts attenuation from electrically evoked auditory steady-state response measurements.
    Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016006. PubMed ID: 29211684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of Auditory Steady State Responses Over Time.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Luke R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):260-268. PubMed ID: 28857787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stochastic resonance in brain activity elicited by auditory stimuli.
    Tanaka K; Nemoto I; Kawakatsu M; Uchikawa Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6300-3. PubMed ID: 19963920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.
    Luke R; Van Deun L; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():37-45. PubMed ID: 25746913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an artifact reduction strategy for electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses: Simulations and measurements.
    Bahmer A; Pieper S; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 296():57-68. PubMed ID: 29291927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of auditory threshold using Multiple Magnitude-Squared Coherence and amplitude modulated tones monaural stimulation around 40 Hz.
    Silva GM; Antunes F; Henrique CS; Felix LB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():71-76. PubMed ID: 29650320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Cheah LA; Hou M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1382-5. PubMed ID: 21096337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of attention on 40Hz auditory steady-state response depends on the stimulation type: Flutter amplitude modulated tones versus clicks.
    Voicikas A; Niciute I; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 629():215-220. PubMed ID: 27424792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
    Hofmann M; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New efficient stimuli for evoking frequency-specific auditory steady-state responses.
    Stürzebecher E; Cebulla M; Elberling C; Berger T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):448-61. PubMed ID: 16866006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):254-68. PubMed ID: 19603882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient and steady state auditory responses with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Verhaert N; Hofmann M; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 25401379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can place-specific cochlear dispersion be represented by auditory steady-state responses?
    Paredes Gallardo A; Epp B; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():76-82. PubMed ID: 26906677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.