396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27071194)
1. Upper-Limb Robotic Exoskeletons for Neurorehabilitation: A Review on Control Strategies.
Proietti T; Crocher V; Roby-Brami A; Jarrasse N
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2016; 9():4-14. PubMed ID: 27071194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exoskeleton and End-Effector Robots for Upper and Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: Narrative Review.
Molteni F; Gasperini G; Cannaviello G; Guanziroli E
PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S174-S188. PubMed ID: 30269804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Haptic Neurorehabilitation and Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Paralysis: A Review.
Piggott L; Wagner S; Ziat M
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2016; 44(1-2):1-32. PubMed ID: 27652449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State of the Art and Future Directions for Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons.
Young AJ; Ferris DP
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Feb; 25(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 26829794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.
Gassert R; Dietz V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 29866106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exoskeleton robots for lower limb assistance: A review of materials, actuation, and manufacturing methods.
Hussain F; Goecke R; Mohammadian M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 34254562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotics for Lower Limb Rehabilitation.
Esquenazi A; Talaty M
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 May; 30(2):385-397. PubMed ID: 30954154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Review of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation: Towards an Automated Process for Upper Limb.
Oña ED; Cano-de la Cuerda R; Sánchez-Herrera P; Balaguer C; Jardón A
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():9758939. PubMed ID: 29707189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State of the art and challenges for the classification of studies on electromechanical and robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review.
Gandolfi M; Valè N; Posteraro F; Morone G; Dell'orco A; Botticelli A; Dimitrova E; Gervasoni E; Goffredo M; Zenzeri J; Antonini A; Daniele C; Benanti P; Boldrini P; Bonaiuti D; Castelli E; Draicchio F; Falabella V; Galeri S; Gimigliano F; Grigioni M; Mazzon S; Molteni F; Petrarca M; Picelli A; Senatore M; Turchetti G; Giansanti D; Mazzoleni S;
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Oct; 57(5):831-840. PubMed ID: 34042413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling.
Durandau G; Farina D; Asín-Prieto G; Dimbwadyo-Terrer I; Lerma-Lara S; Pons JL; Moreno JC; Sartori M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 31315633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness.
de Miguel-Fernández J; Lobo-Prat J; Prinsen E; Font-Llagunes JM; Marchal-Crespo L
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 36805777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience of Robotic Exoskeleton Use at Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.
Heinemann AW; Jayaraman A; Mummidisetty CK; Spraggins J; Pinto D; Charlifue S; Tefertiller C; Taylor HB; Chang SH; Stampas A; Furbish CL; Field-Fote EC
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2018 Oct; 42(4):256-267. PubMed ID: 30199518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
Duret C; Mazzoleni S
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New generation emerging technologies for neurorehabilitation and motor assistance.
Frisoli A; Solazzi M; Loconsole C; Barsotti M
Acta Myol; 2016 Dec; 35(3):141-144. PubMed ID: 28484314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral robots for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: State of the art and future prospects.
Sheng B; Zhang Y; Meng W; Deng C; Xie S
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):587-606. PubMed ID: 27117423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review on Patient-Cooperative Control Strategies for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeletons.
Dalla Gasperina S; Roveda L; Pedrocchi A; Braghin F; Gandolla M
Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():745018. PubMed ID: 34950707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contributions of robotic devices to upper limb poststroke rehabilitation].
Duret C
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2010 May; 166(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 19942243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
