1726 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27071386)
1. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses.
Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions in a Multicenter, Randomized Trial.
Nagula S; Pourmand K; Aslanian H; Bucobo JC; Gonda TA; Gonzalez S; Goodman A; Gross SA; Ho S; DiMaio CJ; Kim MK; Pais S; Poneros JM; Robbins DH; Schnoll-Sussman F; Sethi A; Buscaglia JM;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1307-1313.e1. PubMed ID: 28624647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Chen Q; Wang J; Wu X; Duan Y; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Cheng B
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 29343303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.
Alatawi A; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Chaussade S; Terris B; Barret M; Prat F
United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Aug; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 26279842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
