1717 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27071386)
21. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized crossover trial comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors.
Iwai T; Kida M; Imaizumi H; Miyazawa S; Okuwaki K; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Miyata E; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):228-233. PubMed ID: 29243411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Ayres LR; Kmiotek EK; Lam E; Telford JJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():1415062. PubMed ID: 29850451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Mukai T; Togawa O; Matsubara S; Hatano Y; Hara A; Tanaka M; Shibahara J; Fukayama M; Isayama H; Yasuda I
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Apr; 63(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal number of needle passes during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with 22G ProCore needles and different suction techniques: A randomized controlled trial.
Zhou W; Li SY; Jiang H; Gao L; Li J; Kong XY; Yang L; Fang AQ; Jin ZD; Wang KX
Endosc Ultrasound; 2021; 10(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 33586696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
