464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27072050)
1. A randomized, double-blind trial of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for the management of neutropenia during CHASE(R) chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.
Kubo K; Miyazaki Y; Murayama T; Shimazaki R; Usui N; Urabe A; Hotta T; Tamura K
Br J Haematol; 2016 Aug; 174(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 27072050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma.
Vose JM; Crump M; Lazarus H; Emmanouilides C; Schenkein D; Moore J; Frankel S; Flinn I; Lovelace W; Hackett J; Liang BC
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Feb; 21(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 12560443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Green MD; Koelbl H; Baselga J; Galid A; Guillem V; Gascon P; Siena S; Lalisang RI; Samonigg H; Clemens MR; Zani V; Liang BC; Renwick J; Piccart MJ;
Ann Oncol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12488289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pegfilgrastim appears equivalent to daily dosing of filgrastim to treat neutropenia after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Rifkin R; Spitzer G; Orloff G; Mandanas R; McGaughey D; Zhan F; Boehm KA; Asmar L; Beveridge R
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2010 Jun; 10(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 20511163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.
Holmes FA; O'Shaughnessy JA; Vukelja S; Jones SE; Shogan J; Savin M; Glaspy J; Moore M; Meza L; Wiznitzer I; Neumann TA; Hill LR; Liang BC
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Feb; 20(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 11821454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial.
Sierra J; Szer J; Kassis J; Herrmann R; Lazzarino M; Thomas X; Noga SJ; Baker N; Dansey R; Bosi A
BMC Cancer; 2008 Jul; 8():195. PubMed ID: 18616811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim compared to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) supporting a dose-intensive, rapidly cycling anti-metabolite containing chemotherapy regimen (Hyper-CVAD) for lymphoid malignancy.
Lane SW; Crawford J; Kenealy M; Cull G; Seymour JF; Prince HM; Marlton P; Gill D; Mollee PN
Leuk Lymphoma; 2006 Sep; 47(9):1813-7. PubMed ID: 17064993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective comparison of neutropenia in children with Ewing sarcoma treated with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or pegylated G-CSF.
Milano-Bausset E; Gaudart J; Rome A; Coze C; Gentet JC; Padovani L; Lacarelle B; André N
Clin Ther; 2009; 31 Pt 2():2388-95. PubMed ID: 20110048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09.
Lee KH; Kim JY; Lee MH; Han HS; Lim JH; Park KU; Park IH; Cho EK; Yoon SY; Kim JH; Choi IS; Park JH; Choi YJ; Kim HJ; Jung KH; Kim SY; Oh DY; Im SA
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1709-17. PubMed ID: 26423618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Crawford J
Semin Oncol; 2003 Aug; 30(4 Suppl 13):24-30. PubMed ID: 14508717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.
Zhang W; Jiang Z; Wang L; Li C; Xia J
Med Oncol; 2015 May; 32(5):147. PubMed ID: 25820754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.
Holmes FA; Jones SE; O'Shaughnessy J; Vukelja S; George T; Savin M; Richards D; Glaspy J; Meza L; Cohen G; Dhami M; Budman DR; Hackett J; Brassard M; Yang BB; Liang BC
Ann Oncol; 2002 Jun; 13(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 12123336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
Blackwell K; Donskih R; Jones CM; Nixon A; Vidal MJ; Nakov R; Singh P; Schaffar G; Gascón P; Harbeck N
Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27091420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomised phase II study of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant for lymphoma and myeloma (PALM study).
Sebban C; Lefranc A; Perrier L; Moreau P; Espinouse D; Schmidt A; Kammoun L; Ghesquieres H; Ferlay C; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Pérol D; Michallet M; Quittet P
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 48(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 22248711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized double blind control trial comparing filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in cyclophosphamide peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
Kuan JW; Su AT; Wong SP; Sim XY; Toh SG; Ong TC; Rajasuriarr JS; Lim SH; Guan YK; Liew HK; Liew PK; Tan JT; Kori AN; Cheng YY; Tan SM; Chang KM
Transfus Apher Sci; 2015 Oct; 53(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 25910537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of RGB-02, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III clinical study vs. reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Kahan Z; Grecea D; Smakal M; Tjulandin S; Bondarenko I; Perjesi L; Illes A; Horvat-Karajz K; Aradi I
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):122. PubMed ID: 30727980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study.
Cobb PW; Moon YW; Mezei K; Láng I; Bhat G; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Schwartzberg LS
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6234-6243. PubMed ID: 32687266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
