BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27072390)

  • 1. The use of log file analysis within VMAT audits.
    McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150489. PubMed ID: 27072390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
    Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking log files with dosimetric accuracy--A multi-institutional study on quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Pasler M; Kaas J; Perik T; Geuze J; Dreindl R; Künzler T; Wittkamper F; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2015 Dec; 117(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 26631644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
    Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tool for patient-specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files.
    Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):978-990. PubMed ID: 33332618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.
    Lin X; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang G; Yin Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35842671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement in clinical step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery accuracy on an integrated linear accelerator control system.
    Agnew CE; Irvine DM; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 24621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the modulation degrees of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.
    Park SY; Kim JI; Chun M; Ahn H; Park JM
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30545396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomy-based, patient-specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files.
    Defoor DL; Vazquez-Quino LA; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5283. PubMed ID: 26103490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT.
    Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Carlson JN; Kim K
    Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140698. PubMed ID: 25734490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of complexity metrics in a multi-institutional dosimetry audit of VMAT.
    McGarry CK; Agnew CE; Hussein M; Tsang Y; McWilliam A; Hounsell AR; Clark CH
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1057):20150445. PubMed ID: 26511276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.
    Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Fuangord T; Stanton CJ; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):348-365. PubMed ID: 27685132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of MLC performance in VMAT and dynamic IMRT by log file analysis.
    Olasolo-Alonso J; Vázquez-Galiñanes A; Pellejero-Pellejero S; Pérez-Azorín JF
    Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():87-94. PubMed ID: 28065699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparison of VMAT test results for Clinac 2300C/D and TrueBeam accelerators.
    Latala A; Fujak E; Walewska A; Kukołowicz P
    Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):219-224. PubMed ID: 32008886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a novel methodology for QA of respiratory-gated and VMAT beam delivery using Octavius 4D phantom.
    Yang B; Geng H; Ding Y; Kong CW; Cheung CW; Chiu TL; Lam WW; Cheung KY; Yu SK
    Med Dosim; 2019 Spring; 44(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 29602598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
    Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
    Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric impact and detectability of multi-leaf collimator positioning errors on Varian Halcyon.
    Gay SS; Netherton TJ; Cardenas CE; Ger RB; Balter PA; Dong L; Mihailidis D; Court LE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):47-55. PubMed ID: 31294923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electromagnetic guided couch and multileaf collimator tracking on a TrueBeam accelerator.
    Hansen R; Ravkilde T; Worm ES; Toftegaard J; Grau C; Macek K; Poulsen PR
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2387. PubMed ID: 27147350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries.
    Agnew A; Agnew CE; Grattan MW; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):N49-63. PubMed ID: 24732210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine Log File and Calibration Errors-based Patient-specific Quality Assurance (QA) for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).
    Ma Y; Mou X; Beeraka NM; Guo Y; Liu J; Dai J; Fan R
    Curr Pharm Des; 2023; 29(34):2738-2751. PubMed ID: 37916622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.