445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27072547)
1. Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications.
Wong CH; Chen CP; Wang KG; Sun FJ; Chen CY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 27072547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index.
Figueroa R; Crowell R; Martinez A; Morgan M; Wakefield D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3408-3414. PubMed ID: 29712493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald.
Hume H; Rebarber A; Saltzman DH; Roman AS; Fox NS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2690-2. PubMed ID: 22873518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
McAuliffe L; Issah A; Diacci R; Williams KP; Aubin AM; Phung J; Wang C; Maouris A; Leathersich S; Maouris P; Pennell CE
BJOG; 2023 Jun; 130(7):702-712. PubMed ID: 36810870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two emergency cervical cerclage techniques in twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study matched with cervical dilation.
Qiu L; Lv M; Chen L; Chen Z; Shen J; Wang M; Cai Y; Zhao B; Luo Q
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 164(3):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 37712448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical length, cervical dilation, and gestational age at cerclage placement and the risk of preterm birth in women undergoing ultrasound or exam indicated Shirodkar cerclage.
Bigelow CA; Naqvi M; Namath AG; Ali M; Fox NS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2527-2532. PubMed ID: 30486708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.
Ventolini G; Genrich TJ; Roth J; Neiger R
J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 29(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 19158805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shirodkar cerclage: Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in a single-center cohort of 55 cases.
Bloomfield J; Pénager C; Mandelbrot L
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Nov; 50(9):102152. PubMed ID: 33887533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.
Odibo AO; Berghella V; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM; Nicolaides KH
Am J Perinatol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 17195146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Association between Shirodkar Cerclage and Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in Singleton Pregnancies.
Muniz Rodriguez A; Pastor A; Fox NS
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e347-e350. PubMed ID: 32446260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a new technique of prophylactic cervical cerclage simplified from the Shirodkar cerclage: A pilot study.
Bartolo S; Garabedian C; Deruelle P; Debarge V; Ducloy-Bouthors AS; Subtil D
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 46(4):343-347. PubMed ID: 28643662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knot positioning during McDonald cervical cerclage, does it make a difference? A cohort study.
Atia H; Ellaithy M; Altraigey A; Ibrahim H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3757-3763. PubMed ID: 29764255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prevention of preterm birth by uterine cervical cerclage].
Marcellin L
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Dec; 45(10):1299-1323. PubMed ID: 28029461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. McDonald versus modified Shirodkar rescue cerclage in women with prolapsed fetal membranes.
Basbug A; Bayrak M; Doğan O; Ellibeş Kaya A; Goynumer G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Apr; 33(7):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 30122099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention.
Giraldo-Isaza MA; Fried GP; Hegarty SE; Suescum-Diaz MA; Cohen AW; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 208(3):209.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23201330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes.
Hessami K; Kyvernitakis I; Cozzolino M; Moisidis-Tesch C
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6510-6517. PubMed ID: 33926339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation.
Otsuki K; Nakai A; Matsuda Y; Shinozuka N; Kawabata I; Makino Y; Kamei Y; Iwashita M; Okai T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Feb; 42(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 26633738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Second trimester cerclage of short cervixes: which technique to use? A retrospective study of 25 cases].
Perrotin F; Marret H; Ayeva-Derman M; Alonso AM; Lansac J; Body G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Nov; 31(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 12457136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after periviable ultrasound-indicated cerclage.
Drassinower D; Coviello E; Landy HJ; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Perez-Delboy A; Friedman AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):932-938. PubMed ID: 29108444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suture thickness and transvaginal cervical cerclage outcomes.
Battarbee AN; Pfister A; Manuck TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 Nov; 1(4):100056. PubMed ID: 33179009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
