260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27072589)
1. Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Chorley AJ; Marlow LA; Forster AS; Haddrell JB; Waller J
Psychooncology; 2017 Feb; 26(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 27072589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision-making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study.
Marlow LAV; Chorley AJ; Rockliffe L; Waller J
Psychooncology; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 30095862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden.
Blomberg K; Tishelman C; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Levál A; Widmark C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21091087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, screening, and reasons for non-participation in cervical cancer screening programme in Estonia.
Kivistik A; Lang K; Baili P; Anttila A; Veerus P
BMC Womens Health; 2011 Sep; 11():43. PubMed ID: 21951661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mammography and cervical cancer screening--a systematic review about women's knowledge, attitudes and participation in Germany].
Dreier M; Borutta B; Töppich J; Bitzer EM; Walter U
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Nov; 74(11):722-35. PubMed ID: 22012563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'I do not need to... I do not want to... I do not give it priority...'--why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening.
Oscarsson MG; Wijma BE; Benzein EG
Health Expect; 2008 Mar; 11(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18275400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.
Fylan F
Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Aug; 48(433):1509-14. PubMed ID: 10024713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden.
Forss A; Tishelman C; Widmark C; Lundgren E; Sachs L; Törnberg S
Psychooncology; 2001; 10(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 11180579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with the intention to undergo Pap smear testing in the rural areas of Indonesia: a health belief model.
Sumarmi S; Hsu YY; Cheng YM; Lee SH
Reprod Health; 2021 Jun; 18(1):138. PubMed ID: 34193195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
Yu CK; Rymer J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study.
Wong LP; Wong YL; Low WY; Khoo EM; Shuib R
Int J Behav Med; 2008; 15(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 19005928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Australian women's self-perceived barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review.
Nagendiram A; Bougher H; Banks J; Hall L; Heal C
Health Promot J Austr; 2020 Sep; 31(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 31353682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Influencing Knowledge and Practice Regarding Cervical Cancer and Pap smear Testing among Omani Women.
Alwahaibi N; Alsalami W; Alramadhani N; Alzaabi A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Dec; 19(12):3367-3374. PubMed ID: 30583342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
