These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27073292)

  • 1. An adaptive resampling test for detecting the presence of significant predictors.
    McKeague IW; Qian M
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(512):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 27073292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal screening for high-dimensional predictors of survival outcomes.
    Huang TJ; McKeague IW; Qian M
    Stat Sin; 2019 Oct; 29(4):2105-2139. PubMed ID: 31938013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for Marginal Linear Effects in Quantile Regression.
    Wang HJ; McKeague IW; Qian M
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2018 Mar; 80(2):433-452. PubMed ID: 29576736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inference for survival prediction under the regularized Cox model.
    Sinnott JA; Cai T
    Biostatistics; 2016 Oct; 17(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 27107008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene-wise resampling outperforms site-wise resampling in phylogenetic coalescence analyses.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Feb; 131():80-92. PubMed ID: 30391518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment on "Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification".
    Goldberg Y; Kosorok MR
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2011 Jul; 106(495):920-924. PubMed ID: 23741079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymptotics of Bonferroni for Dependent Normal Test Statistics.
    Proschan MA; Shaw PA
    Stat Probab Lett; 2011 Jul; 81(7):739-748. PubMed ID: 24882910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates.
    Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal validation of risk models in clustered data: a comparison of bootstrap schemes.
    Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Twisk JW; Eijkemans MJ; Vergouwe Y
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 177(11):1209-17. PubMed ID: 23660796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The PIT-trap-A "model-free" bootstrap procedure for inference about regression models with discrete, multivariate responses.
    Warton DI; Thibaut L; Wang YA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181790. PubMed ID: 28738071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure.
    Eichstaedt KE; Kovatch K; Maroof DA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 23648625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normative comparisons for large neuropsychological test batteries: User-friendly and sensitive solutions to minimize familywise false positives.
    Huizenga HM; Agelink van Rentergem JA; Grasman RP; Muslimovic D; Schmand B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Aug; 38(6):611-29. PubMed ID: 27167864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-based bootstrapping when correcting for measurement error with application to logistic regression.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Romeo G; Thoresen M
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 28556914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A resampling approach for adjustment in prediction models for covariate measurement error.
    Li W; Mazumdar S; Arena VC; Sussman N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Mar; 77(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 15721649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate p-values for adaptive designs with binary endpoints.
    Heritier S; Lloyd CJ; Lô SN
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(17):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 28470713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining Nordtest method and bootstrap resampling for measurement uncertainty estimation of hematology analytes in a medical laboratory.
    Cui M; Xu L; Wang H; Ju S; Xu S; Jing R
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 28928006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.