BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074067)

  • 1. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
    Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of a Decision-Making Protocol for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis with Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Staartjes VE; Schröder ML
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e355-e361. PubMed ID: 29133000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.
    Fischgrund JS; Mackay M; Herkowitz HN; Brower R; Montgomery DM; Kurz LT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2807-12. PubMed ID: 9431616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Benzel EC; Amin-Hanjani S; Barker FG; Harrington JF; Magge SN; Strugar J; Coumans JV; Borges LF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Oct; 1(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 15478364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
    Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Weinstein JN; Lurie JD; Tosteson TD; Hanscom B; Tosteson AN; Blood EA; Birkmeyer NJ; Hilibrand AS; Herkowitz H; Cammisa FP; Albert TJ; Emery SE; Lenke LG; Abdu WA; Longley M; Errico TJ; Hu SS
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(22):2257-70. PubMed ID: 17538085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Hermansen E; Fagerland MW; Storheim K; Brox JI; Solberg T; Rekeland F; Franssen E; Weber C; Brisby H; Grundnes O; Algaard KRH; Böker T; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Hellum C;
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Aug; 385(6):526-538. PubMed ID: 34347953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Brodke DS; Annis P; Lawrence BD; Woodbury AM; Daubs MD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2287-94. PubMed ID: 24150428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Blumenthal C; Curran J; Benzel EC; Potter R; Magge SN; Harrington JF; Coumans JV; Ghogawala Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 23373567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health-related quality of life: a comparison of outcomes after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with large joint replacement surgery and population norms.
    Mokhtar SA; McCombe PF; Williamson OD; Morgan MK; White GJ; Sears WR
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 20362246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 76.