BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074450)

  • 1. Dose calculation for hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy: approximating continuous arc delivery and tongue-and-groove modeling.
    Yang J; Tang G; Zhang P; Hunt M; Lim SB; LoSasso T; Mageras G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):3-13. PubMed ID: 27074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous aperture dose calculation and optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Christiansen E; Heath E; Xu T
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):21NT01. PubMed ID: 30362464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sliding-window approach for improved VMAT dose calculation accuracy.
    Alahmad HN; Park JY; Potter NJ; Lu B; Yan G; Liu C; Li JG
    Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 31901300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
    Nguyen D; Lyu Q; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Low DA; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4263. PubMed ID: 27370141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.
    Otto K
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):310-7. PubMed ID: 18293586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
    Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
    Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular under-sampling effect on VMAT dose calculation: An analysis and a solution strategy.
    Park JY; Li F; Li J; Kahler D; Park JC; Yan G; Liu C; Lu B
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2096-2114. PubMed ID: 28370002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Younge KC; Matuszak MM; Moran JM; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Roberts DA
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7160-70. PubMed ID: 23127107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beam controlled arc therapy--a delivery concept for stationary targets.
    Zhang HH; Betzel GT; Yi BY; D'Souza WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7117-29. PubMed ID: 24052088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. VMAT optimization with dynamic collimator rotation.
    Lyu Q; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Yu V; Nguyen D; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2399-2410. PubMed ID: 29659018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-arc VMAT optimization for dual-layer MLC.
    Lyu Q; Neph R; Yu VY; Ruan D; Sheng K
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(9):095028. PubMed ID: 30844772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
    Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery.
    Papp D; Unkelbach J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011701. PubMed ID: 24387493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commissioning of the tongue-and-groove modelling in treatment planning systems: from static fields to VMAT treatments.
    Hernandez V; Vera-Sánchez JA; Vieillevigne L; Saez J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6688-6707. PubMed ID: 28639942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic MLC leaf sequencing for integrated linear accelerator control systems.
    Popple RA; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6039-45. PubMed ID: 22047368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.