These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074450)

  • 1. Dose calculation for hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy: approximating continuous arc delivery and tongue-and-groove modeling.
    Yang J; Tang G; Zhang P; Hunt M; Lim SB; LoSasso T; Mageras G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):3-13. PubMed ID: 27074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous aperture dose calculation and optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Christiansen E; Heath E; Xu T
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):21NT01. PubMed ID: 30362464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sliding-window approach for improved VMAT dose calculation accuracy.
    Alahmad HN; Park JY; Potter NJ; Lu B; Yan G; Liu C; Li JG
    Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 31901300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.
    Nguyen D; Lyu Q; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Low DA; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4263. PubMed ID: 27370141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.
    Otto K
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):310-7. PubMed ID: 18293586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
    Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
    Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stochastic versus deterministic kernel-based superposition approaches for dose calculation of intensity-modulated arcs.
    Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Yu CX; Naqvi SA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4733-46. PubMed ID: 18701770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angular under-sampling effect on VMAT dose calculation: An analysis and a solution strategy.
    Park JY; Li F; Li J; Kahler D; Park JC; Yan G; Liu C; Lu B
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2096-2114. PubMed ID: 28370002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Younge KC; Matuszak MM; Moran JM; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Roberts DA
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7160-70. PubMed ID: 23127107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beam controlled arc therapy--a delivery concept for stationary targets.
    Zhang HH; Betzel GT; Yi BY; D'Souza WD
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7117-29. PubMed ID: 24052088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. VMAT optimization with dynamic collimator rotation.
    Lyu Q; O'Connor D; Ruan D; Yu V; Nguyen D; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2399-2410. PubMed ID: 29659018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
    Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery.
    Papp D; Unkelbach J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011701. PubMed ID: 24387493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commissioning of the tongue-and-groove modelling in treatment planning systems: from static fields to VMAT treatments.
    Hernandez V; Vera-Sánchez JA; Vieillevigne L; Saez J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6688-6707. PubMed ID: 28639942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic MLC leaf sequencing for integrated linear accelerator control systems.
    Popple RA; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6039-45. PubMed ID: 22047368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moving GPU-OpenCL-based Monte Carlo dose calculation toward clinical use: Automatic beam commissioning and source sampling for treatment plan dose calculation.
    Tian Z; Li Y; Hassan-Rezaeian N; Jiang SB; Jia X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 28300376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.