358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074457)
21. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different deformable image registration algorithms in helical, axial, and cone-beam CT images using a mobile phantom.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):62-73. PubMed ID: 29446235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Thor M; Petersen JB; Bentzen L; Høyer M; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 21767192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors.
Castadot P; Lee JA; Parraga A; Geets X; Macq B; Grégoire V
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Oct; 89(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18501456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment and management of interfractional variations in daily diagnostic-quality-CT guided prostate-bed irradiation after prostatectomy.
Liu F; Ahunbay E; Lawton C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031710. PubMed ID: 24593714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient-specific calibration of cone-beam computed tomography data sets for radiotherapy dose calculations and treatment plan assessment.
MacFarlane M; Wong D; Hoover DA; Wong E; Johnson C; Battista JJ; Chen JZ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 29479821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of Varian's SmartAdapt® deformable image registration algorithm for clinical application.
Ramadaan IS; Peick K; Hamilton DA; Evans J; Iupati D; Nicholson A; Greig L; Louwe RJ
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Mar; 10():73. PubMed ID: 25889772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical modeling of neck flexion for deformable alignment of the salivary glands in head and neck cancer images.
McCulloch MM; Anderson BM; Cazoulat G; Peterson CB; Mohamed ASR; Volpe S; Elhalawani H; Bahig H; Rigaud B; King JB; Ford AC; Fuller CD; Brock KK
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(17):175018. PubMed ID: 31269475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Gardner SJ; Wen N; Kim J; Liu C; Pradhan D; Aref I; Cattaneo R; Vance S; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Elshaikh MA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4429-47. PubMed ID: 25988718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A GPU based high-resolution multilevel biomechanical head and neck model for validating deformable image registration.
Neylon J; Qi X; Sheng K; Staton R; Pukala J; Manon R; Low DA; Kupelian P; Santhanam A
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):232-43. PubMed ID: 25563263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a dose warping algorithm using clinically realistic scenarios.
Roussakis YG; Dehghani H; Green S; Webster GJ
Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140691. PubMed ID: 25791569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical Note: The impact of deformable image registration methods on dose warping.
Qin A; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 29297939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Target and organ dose estimation from intensity modulated head and neck radiation therapy using 3 deformable image registration algorithms.
Kumarasiri A; Liu C; Siddiqui F; Zhong H; Chetty IJ; Kim J
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e317-25. PubMed ID: 25752720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing cumulative dose distributions in combined radiotherapy for cervical cancer using deformable image registration with pre-imaging preparations.
Abe T; Tamaki T; Makino S; Ebara T; Hirai R; Miyaura K; Kumazaki Y; Ohno T; Shikama N; Nakano T; Kato S
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():293. PubMed ID: 25526986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.
Varadhan R; Karangelis G; Krishnan K; Hui S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4066. PubMed ID: 23318394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is it sensible to "deform" dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping.
Yeo UJ; Taylor ML; Supple JR; Smith RL; Dunn L; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5065-72. PubMed ID: 22894432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimation of rectal dose using daily megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography and deformable image registration.
Akino Y; Yoshioka Y; Fukuda S; Maruoka S; Takahashi Y; Yagi M; Mizuno H; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):602-8. PubMed ID: 24074934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
