152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074747)
1. Calibrating random forests for probability estimation.
Dankowski T; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):3949-60. PubMed ID: 27074747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison.
Ojeda FM; Jansen ML; Thiéry A; Blankenberg S; Weimar C; Schmid M; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(29):5451-5478. PubMed ID: 37849356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.
Malley JD; Kruppa J; Dasgupta A; Malley KG; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21915433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: applications.
Kruppa J; Liu Y; Diener HC; Holste T; Weimar C; König IR; Ziegler A
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):564-83. PubMed ID: 24989843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A closed testing procedure to select an appropriate method for updating prediction models.
Vergouwe Y; Nieboer D; Oostenbrink R; Debray TPA; Murray GD; Kattan MW; Koffijberg H; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4529-4539. PubMed ID: 27891652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4051-4065. PubMed ID: 31270850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A spline-based tool to assess and visualize the calibration of multiclass risk predictions.
Van Hoorde K; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():283-93. PubMed ID: 25579635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics.
Wright MN; Dankowski T; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 28088842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk estimation using probability machines.
Dasgupta A; Szymczak S; Moore JH; Bailey-Wilson JE; Malley JD
BioData Min; 2014 Mar; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 24581306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction intervals with random forests.
Roy MH; Larocque D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):205-229. PubMed ID: 30786820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.
Davis SE; Lasko TA; Chen G; Matheny ME
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():625-634. PubMed ID: 29854127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Scaling Methods to Obtain Calibrated Probabilities of Activity for Protein-Ligand Predictions.
Mervin LH; Afzal AM; Engkvist O; Bender A
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4546-4559. PubMed ID: 32865408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.
Desai RJ; Wang SV; Vaduganathan M; Evers T; Schneeweiss S
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1918962. PubMed ID: 31922560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury.
Davis SE; Lasko TA; Chen G; Siew ED; Matheny ME
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1052-1061. PubMed ID: 28379439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning workflows to estimate class probabilities for precision cancer diagnostics on DNA methylation microarray data.
Maros ME; Capper D; Jones DTW; Hovestadt V; von Deimling A; Pfister SM; Benner A; Zucknick M; Sill M
Nat Protoc; 2020 Feb; 15(2):479-512. PubMed ID: 31932775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-centered yes/no prognosis using learning machines.
König IR; Malley JD; Pajevic S; Weimar C; Diener HC; Ziegler A
Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2008; 2(4):289-341. PubMed ID: 19216340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.
Taylor RA; Pare JR; Venkatesh AK; Mowafi H; Melnick ER; Fleischman W; Hall MK
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 23(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 26679719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of immune correlates of protection in Shigella infection by application of machine learning.
Arevalillo JM; Sztein MB; Kotloff KL; Levine MM; Simon JK
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Oct; 74():1-9. PubMed ID: 28802838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
