These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074875)

  • 1. Objective diagnosis of arrested labor on transperineal ultrasound.
    Nishimura K; Yoshimura K; Kubo T; Hachisuga T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jul; 42(7):803-9. PubMed ID: 27074875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
    Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
    Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
    Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
    Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Fernández-Palacín A; Aquise A; Valdivieso P; Pastor L; Garrido R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(17):2041-7. PubMed ID: 25327175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?
    Molina FS; Terra R; Carrillo MP; Puertas A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20533441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
    Ghi T; Farina A; Pedrazzi A; Rizzo N; Pelusi G; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 19202576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise.
    Dückelmann AM; Bamberg C; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Nonnenmacher A; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 20069668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.
    Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 11896947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.
    Tutschek B; Torkildsen EA; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 23371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?
    Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Sep; 3(5):100383. PubMed ID: 33901721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Aquise A; Serrano R; Gutiérrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1348-52. PubMed ID: 26037726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound.
    Bamberg C; Scheuermann S; Fotopoulou C; Slowinski T; Dückelmann AM; Teichgräber U; Streitparth F; Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 206(2):161.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22177192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery by transperineal ultrasound performed just after full cervical dilatation is determined.
    Kameyama S; Sato A; Miura H; Kumagai J; Sato N; Shimizu D; Makino K; Terada Y
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 27033869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.
    Sherer DM; Miodovnik M; Bradley KS; Langer O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 11896948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.