These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27074942)

  • 1. Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.
    Tzorakoleftherakis E; Murphey TD; Scheidt RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2403-14. PubMed ID: 27074942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.
    Krueger AR; Giannoni P; Shah V; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):36. PubMed ID: 28464891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback of real-time limb position enhances precision of goal-directed reaching.
    Risi N; Shah V; Mrotek LA; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jul; 122(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 30995149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of visual and vibrotactile feedback methods for seated posture guidance.
    Zheng YJ; Morrell JB
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24808264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voluntary modification of rapid tactile-motor responses during reaching differs from its visuomotor counterpart.
    Reschechtko S; Pruszynski JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Jul; 124(1):284-294. PubMed ID: 32584635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
    Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dynamic vibrotactile feedback on the control of isometric finger force.
    Ahmaniemi T
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 24808334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2089-92. PubMed ID: 21095683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extended training improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback.
    Shah VA; Thomas A; Mrotek LA; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Feb; 241(2):479-493. PubMed ID: 36576510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect.
    Zhao K; Hu L; Qu F; Cui Q; Piao Q; Xu H; Li Y; Wang L; Fu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2283-92. PubMed ID: 27038203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 26449965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation.
    Cappello L; Alghilan W; Gabardi M; Leonardis D; Barsotti M; Frisoli A; Cipriani C
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 32859222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Path Following in Non-Visual Conditions.
    Del Piccolo A; Rocchesso D; Papetti S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 30072341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
    Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task.
    Sigrist R; Rauter G; Riener R; Wolf P
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):455-72. PubMed ID: 24006910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues.
    Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Cavina-Pratesi C; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():41-50. PubMed ID: 24300664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
    Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
    Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous Movement Tracking Performance for Predictable and Unpredictable Tasks with Vibrotactile Feedback.
    Shull PB; Zhu X; Cutkosky MR
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(4):466-475. PubMed ID: 28368831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On-line visual control of grasping movements.
    Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2165-77. PubMed ID: 26996387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.