These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27075019)

  • 1. Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Management.
    Kaplan JR; Lee Z; Eun DD; Reese AC
    Curr Urol Rep; 2016 Jun; 17(6):47. PubMed ID: 27075019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urologic Robotic Surgery.
    Mikhail D; Sarcona J; Mekhail M; Richstone L
    Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Apr; 100(2):361-378. PubMed ID: 32169184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic surgery and anesthesia for pediatric urologic procedures.
    Muñoz CJ; Nguyen HT; Houck CS
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 26963471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopy for the detection and treatment of early complications from minimally invasive urologic surgery.
    Wszolek MF; Canes D; Moinzadeh A; Sorcini A
    J Endourol; 2014 Oct; 28(10):1197-201. PubMed ID: 22734847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image-guided surgery and emerging molecular imaging: advances to complement minimally invasive surgery.
    Mitchell CR; Herrell SD
    Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 25306168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons.
    Guru KA; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Bienko M; Glasgow M; Underwood W; Wilding G; Mohler JL; Menon M; Peabody JO
    Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741. PubMed ID: 19671225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost effectiveness and robot-assisted urologic surgery: does it make dollars and sense?
    Dobbs RW; Magnan BP; Abhyankar N; Hemal AK; Challacombe B; Hu J; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F; Crivellaro S
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Aug; 69(4):313-323. PubMed ID: 28008756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it the End for Urologic Pelvic Laparoscopic Surgery?
    Athanasiadis G; Bourdoumis A; Masood J
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Jun; 27(3):139-146. PubMed ID: 28582377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Approach to Port Placement Templates for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Urologic Surgeries.
    Pathak RA; Patel M; Hemal AK
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1269-1276. PubMed ID: 28967280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology.
    Merseburger AS; Herrmann TR; Shariat SF; Kyriazis I; Nagele U; Traxer O; Liatsikos EN;
    Eur Urol; 2013 Aug; 64(2):277-91. PubMed ID: 23764016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology.
    Song SH; Kim KS
    Korean J Urol; 2014 Aug; 55(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 25132942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications.
    Challacombe BJ; Bochner BH; Dasgupta P; Gill I; Guru K; Herr H; Mottrie A; Pruthi R; Redorta JP; Wiklund P
    Eur Urol; 2011 Oct; 60(4):767-75. PubMed ID: 21620562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Systematic Review of Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Pediatric Urological Literature.
    Aksenov LI; Granberg CF; Gargollo PC
    J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):1010-1016. PubMed ID: 31855124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application in robotic urologic surgery.
    Lin CY; Yang CR; Cheng CL; Ho HC; Chiu KY; Su CK; Chen WM; Wang SS; Chen CS; Li JR; Yang CK; Ou YC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 May; 77(5):242-5. PubMed ID: 24694674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children.
    Sweeney DD; Smaldone MC; Docimo SG
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2007 Jan; 4(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 17211423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative ICG-fluorescence imaging for robotic-assisted urologic surgery: current status and review of literature.
    Pathak RA; Hemal AK
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 May; 51(5):765-771. PubMed ID: 30903392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotics in urological surgery: review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy.
    Singh I
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21198426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery.
    Yuh BE; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Bienko M; Piacente P; Wilding G; Menon M; Peabody J; Guru KA
    J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1637-44. PubMed ID: 20818990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.