These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27077017)

  • 1. Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
    Hartgerink CH; van Aert RC; Nuijten MB; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1935. PubMed ID: 27077017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.
    Krishna A; Peter SM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203470. PubMed ID: 30161249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.
    Masicampo EJ; Lalande DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2271-9. PubMed ID: 22853650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
    Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
    Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread
    Hartgerink CH
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3068. PubMed ID: 28265523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013).
    Nuijten MB; Hartgerink CH; van Assen MA; Epskamp S; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1205-1226. PubMed ID: 26497820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
    Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.
    Batterman S; Su FC; Li S; Mukherjee B; Jia C;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (181):3-63. PubMed ID: 25145040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals.
    Bakker M; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):666-78. PubMed ID: 21494917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research.
    Ravn T; Sørensen MP
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):40. PubMed ID: 34136962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?
    Motyl M; Demos AP; Carsel TS; Hanson BE; Melton ZJ; Mueller AB; Prims JP; Sun J; Washburn AN; Wong KM; Yantis C; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 28447837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of statistical reporting in developmental disability journals.
    Namasivayam AK; Yan T; Wong WY; van Lieshout P
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 26478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Prevalence of Marginally Significant Results in Psychology Over Time.
    Olsson-Collentine A; van Assen MALM; Hartgerink CHJ
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):576-586. PubMed ID: 30789796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.