350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27077029)
1. How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: Recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments.
Svec D; Tichopad A; Novosadova V; Pfaffl MW; Kubista M
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2015 Mar; 3():9-16. PubMed ID: 27077029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pairwise efficiency: a new mathematical approach to qPCR data analysis increases the precision of the calibration curve assay.
Panina Y; Germond A; David BG; Watanabe TM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 31146686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency Correction Is Required for Accurate Quantitative PCR Analysis and Reporting.
Ruijter JM; Barnewall RJ; Marsh IB; Szentirmay AN; Quinn JC; van Houdt R; Gunst QD; van den Hoff MJB
Clin Chem; 2021 Jun; 67(6):829-842. PubMed ID: 33890632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm.
Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2019 Mar; 17():100084. PubMed ID: 31194178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute copy number from the statistics of the quantification cycle in replicate quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments.
Tellinghuisen J; Spiess AN
Anal Chem; 2015 Feb; 87(3):1889-95. PubMed ID: 25582662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction for quantification of genetically modified organisms.
Gerdes L; Iwobi A; Busch U; Pecoraro S
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2016 Mar; 7():9-20. PubMed ID: 27077048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Realizing the value in "non-standard" parts of the qPCR standard curve by integrating fundamentals of quantitative microbiology.
Schmidt PJ; Acosta N; Chik AHS; D'Aoust PM; Delatolla R; Dhiyebi HA; Glier MB; Hubert CRJ; Kopetzky J; Mangat CS; Pang XL; Peterson SW; Prystajecky N; Qiu Y; Servos MR; Emelko MB
Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1048661. PubMed ID: 36937263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fixed-point algorithm for estimating amplification efficiency from a polymerase chain reaction dilution series.
Jones ME; Mayne GC; Wang T; Watson DI; Hussey DJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):372. PubMed ID: 25492416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based LinRegPCR: application for the visualization and analysis of (RT)-qPCR amplification and melting data.
Untergasser A; Ruijter JM; Benes V; van den Hoff MJB
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):398. PubMed ID: 34433408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heparinase treatment of heparin-contaminated plasma from coronary artery bypass grafting patients enables reliable quantification of microRNAs.
Kondratov K; Kurapeev D; Popov M; Sidorova M; Minasian S; Galagudza M; Kostareva A; Fedorov A
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2016 Jun; 8():9-14. PubMed ID: 27335806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay.
Lin CH; Chen YC; Pan TM
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29101. PubMed ID: 22194997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amplification of nonspecific products in quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR).
Ruiz-Villalba A; van Pelt-Verkuil E; Gunst QD; Ruijter JM; van den Hoff MJ
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2017 Dec; 14():7-18. PubMed ID: 29255685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unaccounted uncertainty from qPCR efficiency estimates entails uncontrolled false positive rates.
Bilgrau AE; Falgreen S; Petersen A; Kjeldsen MK; Bødker JS; Johnsen HE; Dybkær K; Bøgsted M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():159. PubMed ID: 27067838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of the real-time RT-PCR method for investigation of small stable RNA expression level in human epidermoid carcinoma cells A431].
Nikitina TV; Nazarova NIu; Tishchenko LI; Tuohimaa P; Sedova VM
Tsitologiia; 2003; 45(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 14520871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between purely stochastic sampling error and the number of technical replicates used to estimate concentration at an extreme dilution.
Irwin PL; Nguyen LH; Chen CY
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Sep; 398(2):895-903. PubMed ID: 20635079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A mechanistic model of PCR for accurate quantification of quantitative PCR data.
Boggy GJ; Woolf PJ
PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12355. PubMed ID: 20814578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New approaches for the standardization and validation of a real-time qPCR assay using TaqMan probes for quantification of yellow fever virus on clinical samples with high quality parameters.
Fernandes-Monteiro AG; Trindade GF; Yamamura AM; Moreira OC; de Paula VS; Duarte AC; Britto C; Lima SM
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2015; 11(7):1865-71. PubMed ID: 26011746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The state of RT-quantitative PCR: firsthand observations of implementation of minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments (MIQE).
Taylor SC; Mrkusich EM
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24296827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variables influencing the efficiency and interpretation of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR): An empirical study using Bacteriophage MS2.
Miranda JA; Steward GF
J Virol Methods; 2017 Mar; 241():1-10. PubMed ID: 27940257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
