145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27077677)
1. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.
Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria.
Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M
Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria": Correction to Tylicki et al. (2018).
Psychol Assess; 2019 Jan; 31(1):14. PubMed ID: 30596448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients.
Ng W; Mattos LA; Coffey CA; Molina SM; Gottfried ED; Glassmire DM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101698. PubMed ID: 33819780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2.
Liu C; Liu Z; Chiu HF; Carl TW; Zhang H; Wang P; Wu G; Mwansisya TE; Cao L; Hu A; Wang Y; Xue Z
BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 13():254. PubMed ID: 24106829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index.
Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD
Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the gold standard: a review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B
Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 21381842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Gottfried E; Glassmire D
Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining the use of the M-FAST with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial.
Miller HA
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Jun; 48(3):268-80. PubMed ID: 15142307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for malingering in a correctional setting.
Norris MP; May MC
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Jun; 22(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 9631665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Dole T; Pivovarova E; Zapf PA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17558482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]