These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27077956)

  • 1. Automatic effects of no-go instructions.
    Liefooghe B; Degryse J; Theeuwes M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):232-241. PubMed ID: 27077956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies.
    Theeuwes M; De Houwer J; Eder A; Liefooghe B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():43-50. PubMed ID: 25939136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):649-72. PubMed ID: 18999358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.
    Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1470-1480. PubMed ID: 24884648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There are limits to the effects of task instructions: Making the automatic effects of task instructions context-specific takes practice.
    Braem S; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J; Brass M; Abrahamse EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 27617776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.
    Best M; Lawrence NS; Logan GD; McLaren IP; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):115-37. PubMed ID: 26322688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Assimilation of Instructions: Stimulus-response Associations are Implemented but not Stimulus-task Associations.
    Liefooghe B; Verbruggen F
    J Cogn; 2019 Jul; 2(1):20. PubMed ID: 31517238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategic influences on implementing instructions for future actions.
    Wenke D; Gaschler R; Nattkemper D; Frensch PA
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jul; 73(4):587-601. PubMed ID: 19360437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instruction-induced feature binding.
    Wenke D; Gaschler R; Nattkemper D
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jan; 71(1):92-106. PubMed ID: 16341902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.
    Braem S; Deltomme B; Liefooghe B
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1582-1591. PubMed ID: 31215007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic motor activation by mere instruction.
    Everaert T; Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 14(4):1300-9. PubMed ID: 24841079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies": Correction to Best et al. (2016).
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):428. PubMed ID: 28134551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.
    Gaschler R; Frensch PA; Cohen A; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1389-407. PubMed ID: 22545612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation.
    Liefooghe B; De Houwer J; Wenke D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 23413011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of ERP components by task instructions in a cued go/no-go task.
    Aasen IE; Brunner JF
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 26488615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complementary roles of cortical oscillations in automatic and controlled processing during rapid serial tasks.
    Isabella S; Ferrari P; Jobst C; Cheyne JA; Cheyne D
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():268-81. PubMed ID: 26049145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How automatic is the hand's automatic pilot? Evidence from dual-task studies.
    McIntosh RD; Mulroue A; Brockmole JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 206(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 20820760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of factors that influence children's instruction following.
    Sy JR; Donaldson JM; Vollmer TR; Pizarro E
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 24127397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training Motor Sequences: Effects of Speed and Accuracy Instructions.
    Barnhoorn JS; Panzer S; Godde B; Verwey WB
    J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(5):540-550. PubMed ID: 30395789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.