These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Minimizing the time to search visual displays: the role of highlighting. Fisher DL; Coury BG; Tengs TO; Duffy SA Hum Factors; 1989 Apr; 31(2):167-82. PubMed ID: 2744770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what? Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects. Blough DS J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of display size on visual attention. Chen IP; Liao CN; Yeh SH Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):959-74. PubMed ID: 21853782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complexity effects on reaction-time measures of visual persistence: evidence for peripheral and central contributions. Long GM; Wurst SA Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(4):537-61. PubMed ID: 6517163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time stress and the processing of visual displays. Coury BG; Boulette MD Hum Factors; 1992 Dec; 34(6):707-25. PubMed ID: 1292992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. Ward R; McClelland JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):664-72. PubMed ID: 2531203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distance and organization in multifunction displays. Seidler KS; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 1992 Oct; 34(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 1459566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the selection and evaluation of visual display symbology: factors influencing search and identification times. Remington R; Williams D Hum Factors; 1986 Aug; 28(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 3793109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A human performance evaluation of graphic symbol-design features. Samet MG; Geiselman RE; Landee BM Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1303-10. PubMed ID: 6180374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus. Inamori Y; Inamori R Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The sensitivity of response measures of alphanumeric legibility to variations in dot matrix display parameters. Snyder HL; Taylor GB Hum Factors; 1979 Aug; 21(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 478548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Acquisition and decision during target search of visual letter displays. Donderi DC Percept Psychophys; 1985 Apr; 37(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 4034352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial report, visual matching, and search as a function of cue-delay. Schulz T Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1989; 141(3):213-35. PubMed ID: 2631635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A two-term exponential functional description of the time course of sustained attention. Giambra LM; Quilter RE Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 3436620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid discrimination of visual patterns in children and adults. Saarinen J Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Feb; 66(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 3362648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]