BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27078825)

  • 1. Appending Limited Clinical Data to an Administrative Database for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: The Impact on the Assessment of Hospital Quality.
    Hannan EL; Samadashvili Z; Cozzens K; Jacobs AK; Venditti FJ; Holmes DR; Berger PB; Stamato NJ; Hughes S; Walford G
    Med Care; 2016 May; 54(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 27078825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appending limited clinical data to an administrative database for assessing institutional quality outliers for AMI care: does it matter?
    Weller WE; Kabra G; Cozzens KS; Hannan EL
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19038463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing hospital performance for acute myocardial infarction: how should emergency department transfers be attributed.
    Samadashvili Z; Hannan EL; Cozzens K; Walford G; Jacobs AK; Berger PB; Holmes DR; Venditti FJ; Curtis J
    Med Care; 2015 Mar; 53(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 25675402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough?
    Hannan EL; Racz MJ; Jollis JG; Peterson ED
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Feb; 31(6):659-78. PubMed ID: 9018210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.
    Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1683-92. PubMed ID: 16549637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of Care at Hospitals Identified as Outliers in Publicly Reported Mortality Statistics for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Waldo SW; McCabe JM; Kennedy KF; Zigler CM; Pinto DS; Yeh RW
    Circulation; 2017 May; 135(20):1897-1907. PubMed ID: 28249879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a Hospital Outcome Measure Intended for Use With Electronic Health Records: 30-Day Risk-standardized Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    McNamara RL; Wang Y; Partovian C; Montague J; Mody P; Eddy E; Krumholz HM; Bernheim SM
    Med Care; 2015 Sep; 53(9):818-26. PubMed ID: 26225445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Bruckel J; Nallamothu BK; Ling F; Howell EH; Lowenstein CJ; Thomas S; Bradley SM; Mehta A; Walkey AJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Mar; 12(3):e005196. PubMed ID: 30879325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An administrative claims measure of payments made for Medicare patients for a 30-day episode of care for acute myocardial infarction.
    Kim N; Bernheim SM; Ott LS; Han L; Spivack SB; Xu X; Volpe M; Liu A; Krumholz HM
    Med Care; 2015 Jun; 53(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 25970575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.
    Lawson EH; Zingmond DS; Hall BL; Louie R; Brook RH; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 25569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do well-publicized risk-adjusted outcomes reports affect hospital volume?
    Romano PS; Zhou H
    Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 15076814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Krumholz HM; Lin Z; Drye EE; Desai MM; Han LF; Rapp MT; Mattera JA; Normand SL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2011 Mar; 4(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 21406673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of hospital teaching intensity on quality of care and patient outcomes.
    Mueller SK; Lipsitz S; Hicks LS
    Med Care; 2013 Jul; 51(7):567-74. PubMed ID: 23604017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with heart failure.
    Krumholz HM; Wang Y; Mattera JA; Wang Y; Han LF; Ingber MJ; Roman S; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2006 Apr; 113(13):1693-701. PubMed ID: 16549636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should we add clinical variables to administrative data?: The case of risk-adjusted case fatality rates after admission for acute myocardial infarction.
    Johnston TC; Coory MD; Scott I; Duckett S
    Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 18007168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How pooling fragmented healthcare encounter data affects hospital profiling.
    Hanchate AD; Ash AS; Borzecki A; Abdulkerim H; Stolzmann KL; Rosen AK; Fink AS; Pugh MJ; Shokeen P; Shwartz M
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Feb; 21(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 25880362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Community factors, hospital characteristics and inter-regional outcome variations following acute myocardial infarction in Canada.
    Alter DA; Austin PC; Tu JV;
    Can J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 21(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 15776114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing clinical and administrative data for profiling hospitals on postdischarge medication use by patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Austin PC; Donovan L; Yun L; Tu JV
    Am Heart J; 2008 Sep; 156(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 18760146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.