These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27079286)
21. Implant position calculation for acetabular cup placement considering pelvic lateral tilt and inclination. Chen E; Goertz W; Lill CA Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Nov; 11(6):309-16. PubMed ID: 17458765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acetabular center axis: is it the future of hip navigation? Hakki S; Bilotta V; Oliveira JD; Dordelly L Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10 Suppl):43-7. PubMed ID: 20954629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. Lazennec JY; Rousseau MA; Rangel A; Gorin M; Belicourt C; Brusson A; Catonné Y Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Jun; 97(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 21570378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acetabular component orientation in intra- and postoperative positions in total hip arthroplasty. Hayakawa K; Minoda Y; Aihara M; Sakawa A; Ohzono K; Tada K Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Sep; 129(9):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18427818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. Babisch JW; Layher F; Amiot LP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):357-65. PubMed ID: 18245596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement. Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; Taylor A; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Murray DW; Gill HS Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 24986939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A validation model for measurement of acetabular component position. Malik A; Wan Z; Jaramaz B; Bowman G; Dorr LD J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):812-9. PubMed ID: 19553075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Statistical Shape Modeling to Determine the Anterior Pelvic Plane for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Guezou-Philippe A; Dardenne G; Salhi A; Burdin V; Lefevre C; Stindel E Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1364-1367. PubMed ID: 33018242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. Sotereanos NG; Miller MC; Smith B; Hube R; Sewecke JJ; Wohlrab D J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):832-40. PubMed ID: 16950035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement. Eilander W; Harris SJ; Henkus HE; Cobb JP; Hogervorst T Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 24078527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Blendea S; Eckman K; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ; Digioia AM Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 16199380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. Miyoshi H; Mikami H; Oba K; Amari R J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 22153949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The transverse pelvic plane: a new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty. Dandachli W; Richards R; Sauret V; Cobb JP Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Nov; 11(6):322-6. PubMed ID: 17458767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cup positioning in total hip arthoplasty: spatial alignment of the acetabular entry plane. Wohlrab D; Radetzki F; Noser H; Mendel T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Jan; 132(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21874577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty. Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation. Nawabi DH; Conditt MA; Ranawat AS; Dunbar NJ; Jones J; Banks S; Padgett DE Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 23662346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: Influence of pelvic orientation and surgical positioning technique. Rutherford M; O'Connor JD; Gill HS; Hill J; Beverland D; Lennon AB; Dunne NJ Med Eng Phys; 2019 Feb; 64():7-14. PubMed ID: 30638787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative study of acetabular center axis vs anterior pelvic plane registration technique in navigated hip arthroplasty. Hakki S; Dordelly L; Oliveira D Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reliability of cup position in navigated THA in the lateral decubitus position using the 'flip technique'. Carcangiu A; D'Arrigo C; Topa D; Alonzo R; Speranza A; De Sanctis S; Ferretti A Hip Int; 2011; 21(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 22135017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Definition and determination of acetabular component orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Cross AR; Newell SM Vet Surg; 2000; 29(6):507-16. PubMed ID: 11098783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]