These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27079528)

  • 1. The connectivity domain: Analyzing resting state fMRI data using feature-based data-driven and model-based methods.
    Iraji A; Calhoun VD; Wiseman NM; Davoodi-Bojd E; Avanaki MRN; Haacke EM; Kou Z
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():494-507. PubMed ID: 27079528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient Arousal Modulations Contribute to Resting-State Functional Connectivity Changes Associated with Head Motion Parameters.
    Gu Y; Han F; Sainburg LE; Liu X
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Sep; 30(10):5242-5256. PubMed ID: 32406488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of resting-state FMRI and diffusion-weighted MRI connectivity analyses of the human brain: limitations and improvement.
    Zhu DC; Majumdar S
    J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 23279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional networks and network perturbations in rodents.
    Chuang KH; Nasrallah FA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():419-436. PubMed ID: 28942060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of heritability estimates on resting state fMRI connectivity phenotypes using the ENIGMA analysis pipeline.
    Adhikari BM; Jahanshad N; Shukla D; Glahn DC; Blangero J; Fox PT; Reynolds RC; Cox RW; Fieremans E; Veraart J; Novikov DS; Nichols TE; Hong LE; Thompson PM; Kochunov P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Dec; 39(12):4893-4902. PubMed ID: 30052318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural and metabolic basis of dynamic resting state fMRI.
    Thompson GJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):448-462. PubMed ID: 28899744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain resting-state functional MRI connectivity: morphological foundation and plasticity.
    Zhou IY; Liang YX; Chan RW; Gao PP; Cheng JS; Hu Y; So KF; Wu EX
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():1-10. PubMed ID: 23988270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resting state dynamics meets anatomical structure: Temporal multiple kernel learning (tMKL) model.
    Surampudi SG; Misra J; Deco G; Bapi RS; Sharma A; Roy D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():609-620. PubMed ID: 30267857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directional patterns of cross frequency phase and amplitude coupling within the resting state mimic patterns of fMRI functional connectivity.
    Weaver KE; Wander JD; Ko AL; Casimo K; Grabowski TJ; Ojemann JG; Darvas F
    Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():238-251. PubMed ID: 26747745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity.
    Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal complexity of fMRI is reproducible and correlates with higher order cognition.
    Omidvarnia A; Zalesky A; Mansour L S; Van De Ville D; Jackson GD; Pedersen M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117760. PubMed ID: 33486124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information.
    Yaesoubi M; Allen EA; Miller RL; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():133-42. PubMed ID: 26162552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fine-grained mapping of mouse brain functional connectivity with resting-state fMRI.
    Mechling AE; Hübner NS; Lee HL; Hennig J; von Elverfeldt D; Harsan LA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():203-15. PubMed ID: 24718287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spatial chronnectome reveals a dynamic interplay between functional segregation and integration.
    Iraji A; Deramus TP; Lewis N; Yaesoubi M; Stephen JM; Erhardt E; Belger A; Ford JM; McEwen S; Mathalon DH; Mueller BA; Pearlson GD; Potkin SG; Preda A; Turner JA; Vaidya JG; van Erp TGM; Calhoun VD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jul; 40(10):3058-3077. PubMed ID: 30884018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI.
    Almgren H; Van de Steen F; Razi A; Friston K; Marinazzo D
    Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116435. PubMed ID: 31816423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional connectivity hubs of the mouse brain.
    Liska A; Galbusera A; Schwarz AJ; Gozzi A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 115():281-91. PubMed ID: 25913701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in directed functional brain connectivity related to age, sex and mental health.
    Lund MJ; Alnaes D; Schwab S; van der Meer D; Andreassen OA; Westlye LT; Kaufmann T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(15):4173-4186. PubMed ID: 32613721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.