BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27079598)

  • 1. Validation of photoscreening technology in the general pediatrics office: a prospective study.
    Bregman J; Donahue SP
    J AAPOS; 2016 Apr; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 27079598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update.
    Donahue SP; Arthur B; Neely DE; Arnold RW; Silbert D; Ruben JB;
    J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 23360915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective vision screening in 3-year-old children at a multispecialty practice.
    Lowry EA; Wang W; Nyong'o O
    J AAPOS; 2015 Feb; 19(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25727580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
    Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children.
    Salcido AA; Bradley J; Donahue SP
    J AAPOS; 2005 Apr; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 15838437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field evaluation of the Welch Allyn SureSight vision screener: incorporating the vision in preschoolers study recommendations.
    Rowatt AJ; Donahue SP; Crosby C; Hudson AC; Simon S; Emmons K
    J AAPOS; 2007 Jun; 11(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17140828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the GoCheck Kids Vision Screener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors.
    Peterseim MMW; Rhodes RS; Patel RN; Wilson ME; Edmondson LE; Logan SA; Cheeseman EW; Shortridge E; Trivedi RH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 187():87-91. PubMed ID: 29305313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for amblyogenic risk factors using the PlusoptiX S04 photoscreener on the indigent population of Honduras.
    Matta NS; Singman EL; McCarus C; Matta E; Silbert DI
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1848-50. PubMed ID: 20472292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening.
    Cordonnier M; Kallay O
    Strabismus; 2001 Jun; 9(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 11458294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successes and shortfalls of community Plusoptix photoscreening: results from the iSee study in Southwestern Ontario.
    Kiatos E; Armstrong JJ; Makar I
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 56(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 32891567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
    Enzenauer RW
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of computer-photoscreening with non-cycloplegic retinoscopy for amblyopiogenic risk factors in children.
    Guo X; Jia X; Guo L; Xiao X; Shen H; Li S; Zhang Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2000 Nov; 113(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 11776113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in young children in Costa Rica.
    Arana Mendez M; Arguello L; Martinez J; Salas Vargas M; Alvarado Rodriguez AM; Papa CE; Peterseim CM; Otárola Víquez M; Trivedi RH; Peterseim MM
    J AAPOS; 2015 Oct; 19(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26486026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.
    Moghaddam AA; Kargozar A; Zarei-Ghanavati M; Najjaran M; Nozari V; Shakeri MT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 21515564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort.
    Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of Amblyogenic Refractive Error Using the Spot Vision Screener in Children.
    Gaiser H; Moore B; Srinivasan G; Solaka N; He R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):324-331. PubMed ID: 32413003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community vision screening in preschoolers: initial experience using the Plusoptix S12C automated photoscreening camera.
    Asare AO; Malvankar-Mehta MS; Makar I
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 52(5):480-485. PubMed ID: 28985808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibration and validation of the 2WIN photoscreener compared to the PlusoptiX S12 and the SPOT.
    Kirk S; Armitage MD; Dunn S; Arnold RW
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 25000209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the plusoptiX S04 photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children aged 3 to 5.
    Matta NS; Singman EL; Silbert DI
    J AAPOS; 2010 Apr; 14(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 20451857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.
    Paff T; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Wolterbeek R; Swart-van den Berg M; de Nie JM; Tijssen E; Schalij-Delfos NE
    J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 21168070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.