These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27079770)

  • 1. Impact of MammaPrint on Clinical Decision-Making in South African Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
    Pohl H; Kotze MJ; Grant KA; van der Merwe L; Pienaar FM; Apffelstaedt JP; Myburgh EJ
    Breast J; 2016 Jul; 22(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 27079770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European inter-institutional impact study of MammaPrint.
    Cusumano PG; Generali D; Ciruelos E; Manso L; Ghanem I; Lifrange E; Jerusalem G; Klaase J; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Dekker-Vroling L; Lutke Holzik M
    Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 24685596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A nationwide registry-based cohort study of the MammaPrint genomic risk classifier in invasive breast cancer.
    Groenendijk FH; Jager A; Cardoso F; van Deurzen CHM
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():125-131. PubMed ID: 29310037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic profiling of breast cancer in African-American women using MammaPrint.
    Nunes RA; Wray L; Mete M; Herbolsheimer P; Smith KL; Bijelic L; Boisvert ME; Swain SM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 27568021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strong impact of MammaPrint and BluePrint on treatment decisions in luminal early breast cancer: results of the WSG-PRIMe study.
    Wuerstlein R; Kates R; Gluz O; Grischke EM; Schem C; Thill M; Hasmueller S; Köhler A; Otremba B; Griesinger F; Schindlbeck C; Trojan A; Otto F; Knauer M; Pusch R; Harbeck N;
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jun; 175(2):389-399. PubMed ID: 30796651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Glück S; de Snoo F; Peeters J; Stork-Sloots L; Somlo G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 23756626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Test on the Choice of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.
    Zeng Y; Li Q; Qin T; Li S; Jin L; Wu J; Chen K; Deng H; Rao N; Liu Q; Su F; Jia W; Yao H
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Aug; 37(8):4539-4547. PubMed ID: 28739750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MammaPrint Pre-screen Algorithm (MPA) reduces chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer.
    Grant KA; Apffelstaedt JP; Wright CA; Myburgh E; Pienaar R; De Klerk M; Kotze MJ
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jul; 103(8):522-6. PubMed ID: 23885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additional prognostic value of the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint(®)) among breast cancer patients with 4-9 positive lymph nodes.
    Saghatchian M; Mook S; Pruneri G; Viale G; Glas AM; Guerin S; Cardoso F; Piccart M; Tursz T; Delaloge S; van't Veer L
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 23347730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of risk classification between EndoPredict and MammaPrint in ER-positive/HER2-negative primary invasive breast cancer.
    Peláez-García A; Yébenes L; Berjón A; Angulo A; Zamora P; Sánchez-Méndez JI; Espinosa E; Redondo A; Heredia-Soto V; Mendiola M; Feliú J; Hardisson D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183452. PubMed ID: 28886093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of the MammaPrint Risk Group Using MRI Features in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, and 1 to 3 Node-Positive Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Kim HJ; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Kim HH
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Feb; 24(2):e80-e90. PubMed ID: 38114364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.
    Krop I; Ismaila N; Andre F; Bast RC; Barlow W; Collyar DE; Hammond ME; Kuderer NM; Liu MC; Mennel RG; Van Poznak C; Wolff AC; Stearns V
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(24):2838-2847. PubMed ID: 28692382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.
    Levine MN; Julian JA; Bedard PL; Eisen A; Trudeau ME; Higgins B; Bordeleau L; Pritchard KI
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(10):1065-71. PubMed ID: 26598746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pooled analysis of prospective European studies assessing the impact of using the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on clinical decision making in women with oestrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early-stage breast cancer.
    Albanell J; Svedman C; Gligorov J; Holt SD; Bertelli G; Blohmer JU; Rouzier R; Lluch A; Eiermann W
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Oct; 66():104-13. PubMed ID: 27544930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.
    Nguyen B; Cusumano PG; Deck K; Kerlin D; Garcia AA; Barone JL; Rivera E; Yao K; de Snoo FA; van den Akker J; Stork-Sloots L; Generali D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3257-63. PubMed ID: 22965266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status correlates with lymph node involvement in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative, but with grade in those with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer suitable for cytotoxic chemotherapy.
    Bartlett JM; Ellis IO; Dowsett M; Mallon EA; Cameron DA; Johnston S; Hall E; A'Hern R; Peckitt C; Bliss JM; Johnson L; Barrett-Lee P; Ellis P
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 25(28):4423-30. PubMed ID: 17906205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is gene array testing to be considered routine now?
    Paik S
    Breast; 2011 Oct; 20 Suppl 3():S87-91. PubMed ID: 22015300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metastatic potential of T1 breast cancer can be predicted by the 70-gene MammaPrint signature.
    Mook S; Knauer M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Retel VP; Wesseling J; Linn SC; Van't Veer LJ; Rutgers EJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1406-13. PubMed ID: 20094918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evidence supporting genomic tests in early breast cancer: Do all genomic tests provide the same information?
    Markopoulos C; van de Velde C; Zarca D; Ozmen V; Masetti R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):909-920. PubMed ID: 27639633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Partin JF; Mamounas EP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3399-406. PubMed ID: 21537874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.