These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080602)

  • 1. Digital impression-taking: Fundamentals and benefits in orthodontics.
    Lecocq G
    Int Orthod; 2016 Jun; 14(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 27080602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Students' perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics.
    Schott TC; Arsalan R; Weimer K
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30866910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of iTero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both
    Jabri MA; Wu S; Pan Y; Wang L
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jan; 24(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33473018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic scanners: what's available?
    Martin CB; Chalmers EV; McIntyre GT; Cochrane H; Mossey PA
    J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 25939980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants.
    Pradíes G; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Giménez B; Martínez-Rus F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 24686966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients.
    Burhardt L; Livas C; Kerdijk W; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 27476358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fully digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone.
    Monaco C; Evangelisti E; Scotti R; Mignani G; Zucchelli G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 25907030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical 3D scans for orthodontic diagnostics performed on full-arch impressions. Completeness of surface structure representation.
    Vogel AB; Kilic F; Schmidt F; Rübel S; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Nov; 76(6):493-507. PubMed ID: 26250455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality.
    Birnbaum NS; Aaronson HB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505. PubMed ID: 18935788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics.
    Saccomanno S; Saran S; Vanella V; Mastrapasqua RF; Raffaelli L; Levrini L
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 36005245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Record taking in the orthodontic office.
    Baker IM
    Dent Assist (1931); 1991; 60(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 1860526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of three-dimensional digital technology in the diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics].
    Bai YX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 51(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 27256524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinicians reaping benefits of new concepts in impressioning.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Feb; 36(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 25822643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.