These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080633)

  • 1. Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.
    Roussel C; Carbonneil C; Audry A;
    Therapie; 2016 Feb; 71(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 27080633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
    Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.
    Tarricone R; Callea G; Ogorevc M; Prevolnik Rupel V
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():70-92. PubMed ID: 28139085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
    Matuszewski KA
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
    Polisena J; Castaldo R; Ciani O; Federici C; Borsci S; Ritrovato M; Clark D; Pecchia L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):276-289. PubMed ID: 29909792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and non-clinical impact of medical devices.
    Dervaux B; Szwarcensztein K; Josseran A; ; Barna A; Carbonneil C; Chevrie K; Debroucker F; Grumblat A; Grumel O; Massol J; Maugendre P; Méchin H; Orlikowski D; Roussel C; Rumeau-Pichon C; Sales JP; Vicaut E
    Therapie; 2015; 70(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 25747839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of the economic tools for assessing new medical devices.
    Craig JA; Carr L; Hutton J; Glanville J; Iglesias CP; Sims AJ
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 13(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 25139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges.
    Kingkaew P; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S102-7. PubMed ID: 24964706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
    Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
    Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.
    Ciani O; Wilcher B; Blankart CR; Hatz M; Rupel VP; Erker RS; Varabyova Y; Taylor RS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 26044729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of Economic Submissions to NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme.
    Alshreef A; Jenks M; Green W; Dixon S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 14(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 27480537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrinsic properties of medical devices: considerations for economic evaluation.
    Basu R; Eggington S
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Dec; 19(6):619-626. PubMed ID: 31721598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TAXONOMY OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE LOGIC OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Henschke C; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 26711471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: a Bayesian approach.
    Vallejo-Torres L; Steuten LM; Buxton MJ; Girling AJ; Lilford RJ; Young T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 18828941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications.
    Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expanding Health Technology Assessments to Include Effects on the Environment.
    Marsh K; Ganz ML; Hsu J; Strandberg-Larsen M; Gonzalez RP; Lund N
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 27021760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.