These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080646)

  • 1. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM; Delgutte B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.
    Brown AD; Anbuhl KL; Gilmer JI; Tollin DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 31314646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
    Sammeth CA; Brown AD; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
    Sammeth CA; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.
    Haywood NR; Undurraga JA; Marquardt T; McAlpine D
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Monaural Temporal Electrode Asynchrony and Channel Interactions in Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear-Implant Stimulation.
    Lindenbeck MJ; Majdak P; Laback B
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241271340. PubMed ID: 39215517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.