269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080646)
1. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Hu H; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
Smith ZM; Delgutte B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.
Brown AD; Anbuhl KL; Gilmer JI; Tollin DJ
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 31314646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
Sammeth CA; Brown AD; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
Sammeth CA; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.
Haywood NR; Undurraga JA; Marquardt T; McAlpine D
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
Kan A; Stoelb C; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2923-36. PubMed ID: 24116428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
