269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080646)
21. A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Jensen KK; Cosentino S; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521997324. PubMed ID: 34057382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Noble JH; Phatak SA; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Bernstein JGW
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):666-675. PubMed ID: 35761459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.
Laumen G; Ferber AT; Klump GM; Tollin DJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e276-e290. PubMed ID: 27232077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Cosentino S; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 30623318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.
Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Wozny DR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 24464088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures.
Zhou J; Durrant JD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aging effects on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in the Mongolian gerbil: Effects of interaural time and level differences.
Laumen G; Tollin DJ; Beutelmann R; Klump GM
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():46-58. PubMed ID: 27173973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Reiss LA; Eggleston JL; Walker EP; Oh Y
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):341-56. PubMed ID: 27220769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing Methods for Pairing Electrodes Across Ears With Cochlear Implants.
Staisloff HE; Aronoff JM
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 33538427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):59. PubMed ID: 27475132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of monaural frequency compression on binaural fusion at the brainstem level.
Klauke I; Kohl MC; Hannemann R; Kornagel U; Strauss DJ; Corona-Strauss FI
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():1646-9. PubMed ID: 26736591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
