197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080666)
1. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Binaural Unmasking of Speech Using a Blind Binaural Processing Stage.
Hauth CF; Berning SC; Kollmeier B; Brand T
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520975630. PubMed ID: 33305690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cochlear implant n-of-m strategy on signal-to-noise ratio below which noise hinders speech recognition.
Stam L; Goverts ST; Smits C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):EL417. PubMed ID: 31153330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants.
Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2418. PubMed ID: 27794329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intelligibility for Binaural Speech with Discarded Low-SNR Speech Components.
Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():73-81. PubMed ID: 27080648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
Graetzer S; Hopkins C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delta-band neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility in noise in preschoolers.
Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Verschueren E; Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108785. PubMed ID: 37172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
Graetzer S; Hopkins C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
