These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27080681)

  • 1. Audio Visual Integration with Competing Sources in the Framework of Audio Visual Speech Scene Analysis.
    Ganesh AC; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():399-408. PubMed ID: 27080681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audio-visual speech scene analysis: characterization of the dynamics of unbinding and rebinding the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):362-77. PubMed ID: 25618066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction across sensory modalities: A neurocomputational model of the McGurk effect.
    Olasagasti I; Bouton S; Giraud AL
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():61-75. PubMed ID: 26009260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: evidence from the speeded classification task.
    Soto-Faraco S; Navarra J; Alsius A
    Cognition; 2004 Jul; 92(3):B13-23. PubMed ID: 15019556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual perception in adults with amblyopia: a study using the McGurk effect.
    Narinesingh C; Wan M; Goltz HC; Chandrakumar M; Wong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3158-64. PubMed ID: 24764068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in audiovisual integration, as measured by McGurk phenomenon, among adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia and age-matched healthy control groups.
    Pearl D; Yodashkin-Porat D; Katz N; Valevski A; Aizenberg D; Sigler M; Weizman A; Kikinzon L
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19216897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A possible neurophysiological correlate of audiovisual binding and unbinding in speech perception.
    Ganesh AC; Berthommier F; Vilain C; Sato M; Schwartz JL
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1340. PubMed ID: 25505438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception.
    van Wassenhove V; Grant KW; Poeppel D
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 16530232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociable Neural Correlates of Multisensory Coherence and Selective Attention.
    Peng F; Bizley JK; Schnupp JW; Auksztulewicz R
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(25):4697-4708. PubMed ID: 37221094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural networks supporting audiovisual integration for speech: A large-scale lesion study.
    Hickok G; Rogalsky C; Matchin W; Basilakos A; Cai J; Pillay S; Ferrill M; Mickelsen S; Anderson SW; Love T; Binder J; Fridriksson J
    Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():360-371. PubMed ID: 29705718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal interactions during perception of audiovisual speech and nonspeech signals: an fMRI study.
    Hertrich I; Dietrich S; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 20044895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times.
    Altieri N; Lentz JJ; Townsend JT; Wenger MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1712-27. PubMed ID: 27188651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a concurrent working memory task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 22353570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.