These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27081073)

  • 1. Developing a pro-regenerative biomaterial scaffold microenvironment requires T helper 2 cells.
    Sadtler K; Estrellas K; Allen BW; Wolf MT; Fan H; Tam AJ; Patel CH; Luber BS; Wang H; Wagner KR; Powell JD; Housseau F; Pardoll DM; Elisseeff JH
    Science; 2016 Apr; 352(6283):366-70. PubMed ID: 27081073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biologic scaffold-associated type 2 immune microenvironment inhibits tumor formation and synergizes with checkpoint immunotherapy.
    Wolf MT; Ganguly S; Wang TL; Anderson CW; Sadtler K; Narain R; Cherry C; Parrillo AJ; Park BV; Wang G; Pan F; Sukumar S; Pardoll DM; Elisseeff JH
    Sci Transl Med; 2019 Jan; 11(477):. PubMed ID: 30700576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine.
    Chung L; Maestas DR; Housseau F; Elisseeff JH
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2017 May; 114():184-192. PubMed ID: 28712923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TISSUE REGENERATION. A scaffold immune microenvironment.
    Badylak SF
    Science; 2016 Apr; 352(6283):298. PubMed ID: 27081059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Scaffold Immune Microenvironment: Biomaterial-Mediated Immune Polarization in Traumatic and Nontraumatic Applications.
    Sadtler K; Allen BW; Estrellas K; Housseau F; Pardoll DM; Elisseeff JH
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Oct; 23(19-20):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 27736323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divergent immune responses to synthetic and biological scaffolds.
    Sadtler K; Wolf MT; Ganguly S; Moad CA; Chung L; Majumdar S; Housseau F; Pardoll DM; Elisseeff JH
    Biomaterials; 2019 Feb; 192():405-415. PubMed ID: 30500722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system.
    Julier Z; Park AJ; Briquez PS; Martino MM
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():13-28. PubMed ID: 28119112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porcine Ischemic Wound-Healing Model for Preclinical Testing of Degradable Biomaterials.
    Patil P; Martin JR; Sarett SM; Pollins AC; Cardwell NL; Davidson JM; Guelcher SA; Nanney LB; Duvall CL
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2017 Nov; 23(11):754-762. PubMed ID: 28762881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response?
    Mariani E; Lisignoli G; Borzì RM; Pulsatelli L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Feb; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 30717232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. T lymphocytes as critical mediators in tissue regeneration, fibrosis, and the foreign body response.
    Adusei KM; Ngo TB; Sadtler K
    Acta Biomater; 2021 Oct; 133():17-33. PubMed ID: 33905946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response: Implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine strategies.
    Martin KE; García AJ
    Acta Biomater; 2021 Oct; 133():4-16. PubMed ID: 33775905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current Strategies for the Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.
    Alarcin E; Bal-Öztürk A; Avci H; Ghorbanpoor H; Dogan Guzel F; Akpek A; Yesiltas G; Canak-Ipek T; Avci-Adali M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 34072959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scaffold biomaterials and nano-based therapeutic strategies for skeletal muscle regeneration.
    Tacchi F; Orozco-Aguilar J; Gutiérrez D; Simon F; Salazar J; Vilos C; Cabello-Verrugio C
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2021 Dec; 16(28):2521-2538. PubMed ID: 34743611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.
    Sass FA; Fuchs M; Pumberger M; Geissler S; Duda GN; Perka C; Schmidt-Bleek K
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Mar; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 29534011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In Vitro Model of Macrophage-Biomaterial Interactions.
    Witherel CE; Graney PL; Spiller KL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1758():161-176. PubMed ID: 29679330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. This paper is the winner of an SFB Award in the Hospital Intern, Residency category: Peptide biomaterials raising adaptive immune responses in wound healing contexts.
    Vigneswaran Y; Han H; De Loera R; Wen Y; Zhang X; Sun T; Mora-Solano C; Collier JH
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Aug; 104(8):1853-62. PubMed ID: 27129604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: existing technologies and future trends.
    Qazi TH; Mooney DJ; Pumberger M; Geissler S; Duda GN
    Biomaterials; 2015; 53():502-21. PubMed ID: 25890747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immune tuning scaffold for the local induction of a pro-regenerative environment.
    Corradetti B; Taraballi F; Corbo C; Cabrera F; Pandolfi L; Minardi S; Wang X; Van Eps J; Bauza G; Weiner B; Tasciotti E
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17030. PubMed ID: 29208986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ADM Scaffolds Generate a Pro-regenerative Microenvironment During Full-Thickness Cutaneous Wound Healing Through M2 Macrophage Polarization via Lamtor1.
    He C; Yang Z; Jin Y; Qi X; Chu J; Deng X
    Front Physiol; 2018; 9():657. PubMed ID: 29915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An acellular biologic scaffold does not regenerate appreciable de novo muscle tissue in rat models of volumetric muscle loss injury.
    Aurora A; Roe JL; Corona BT; Walters TJ
    Biomaterials; 2015 Oct; 67():393-407. PubMed ID: 26256250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.