These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system. Julier Z; Park AJ; Briquez PS; Martino MM Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():13-28. PubMed ID: 28119112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porcine Ischemic Wound-Healing Model for Preclinical Testing of Degradable Biomaterials. Patil P; Martin JR; Sarett SM; Pollins AC; Cardwell NL; Davidson JM; Guelcher SA; Nanney LB; Duvall CL Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2017 Nov; 23(11):754-762. PubMed ID: 28762881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response? Mariani E; Lisignoli G; Borzì RM; Pulsatelli L Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Feb; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 30717232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T lymphocytes as critical mediators in tissue regeneration, fibrosis, and the foreign body response. Adusei KM; Ngo TB; Sadtler K Acta Biomater; 2021 Oct; 133():17-33. PubMed ID: 33905946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Macrophage phenotypes in tissue repair and the foreign body response: Implications for biomaterial-based regenerative medicine strategies. Martin KE; García AJ Acta Biomater; 2021 Oct; 133():4-16. PubMed ID: 33775905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current Strategies for the Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle Tissue. Alarcin E; Bal-Öztürk A; Avci H; Ghorbanpoor H; Dogan Guzel F; Akpek A; Yesiltas G; Canak-Ipek T; Avci-Adali M Int J Mol Sci; 2021 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 34072959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scaffold biomaterials and nano-based therapeutic strategies for skeletal muscle regeneration. Tacchi F; Orozco-Aguilar J; Gutiérrez D; Simon F; Salazar J; Vilos C; Cabello-Verrugio C Nanomedicine (Lond); 2021 Dec; 16(28):2521-2538. PubMed ID: 34743611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Sass FA; Fuchs M; Pumberger M; Geissler S; Duda GN; Perka C; Schmidt-Bleek K Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Mar; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 29534011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vitro Model of Macrophage-Biomaterial Interactions. Witherel CE; Graney PL; Spiller KL Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1758():161-176. PubMed ID: 29679330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. This paper is the winner of an SFB Award in the Hospital Intern, Residency category: Peptide biomaterials raising adaptive immune responses in wound healing contexts. Vigneswaran Y; Han H; De Loera R; Wen Y; Zhang X; Sun T; Mora-Solano C; Collier JH J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Aug; 104(8):1853-62. PubMed ID: 27129604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomaterials based strategies for skeletal muscle tissue engineering: existing technologies and future trends. Qazi TH; Mooney DJ; Pumberger M; Geissler S; Duda GN Biomaterials; 2015; 53():502-21. PubMed ID: 25890747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immune tuning scaffold for the local induction of a pro-regenerative environment. Corradetti B; Taraballi F; Corbo C; Cabrera F; Pandolfi L; Minardi S; Wang X; Van Eps J; Bauza G; Weiner B; Tasciotti E Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17030. PubMed ID: 29208986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ADM Scaffolds Generate a Pro-regenerative Microenvironment During Full-Thickness Cutaneous Wound Healing Through M2 Macrophage Polarization via Lamtor1. He C; Yang Z; Jin Y; Qi X; Chu J; Deng X Front Physiol; 2018; 9():657. PubMed ID: 29915541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An acellular biologic scaffold does not regenerate appreciable de novo muscle tissue in rat models of volumetric muscle loss injury. Aurora A; Roe JL; Corona BT; Walters TJ Biomaterials; 2015 Oct; 67():393-407. PubMed ID: 26256250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]