These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27082461)

  • 1. Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?
    Budin-Ljøsne I; Mascalzoni D; Soini S; Machado H; Kaye J; Bentzen HB; Rial-Sebbag E; D'Abramo F; Witt M; Schamps G; Katić V; Krajnovic D; Harris JR
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2016 Jun; 14(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 27082461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An implementation framework for the feedback of individual research results and incidental findings in research.
    Thorogood A; Joly Y; Knoppers BM; Nilsson T; Metrakos P; Lazaris A; Salman A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():88. PubMed ID: 25539799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
    Banks TM
    Sask Law Rev; 2000; 63(2):539-80. PubMed ID: 12666671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experts reflecting on the duty to recontact patients and research participants; why professionals should take the lead in developing guidelines.
    Mitchell C; Ploem C; Retèl V; Gevers S; Hennekam R
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Feb; 63(2):103642. PubMed ID: 30904667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
    Jaitovich Groisman I; Egalite N; Godard B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():80. PubMed ID: 25410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants.
    Ossorio PN
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):24-5; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.
    Ries NM; LeGrandeur J; Caulfield T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Mar; 11():4. PubMed ID: 20331891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Questions, complexities, and limitations in disclosing individual genetic results.
    Klitzman R
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):34-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
    Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An update to returning genetic research results to individuals: perspectives of the industry pharmacogenomics working group.
    Prucka SK; Arnold LJ; Brandt JE; Gilardi S; Harty LC; Hong F; Malia J; Pulford DJ
    Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 24471556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
    Ravitsky V; Wilfond BS
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):8-17. PubMed ID: 17085395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
    Hens K; Nys H; Cassiman JJ; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Mar; 37(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 21059631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials.
    Wolf LE; Lo B
    IRB; 2004; 26(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 15449408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.
    Otten E; Plantinga M; Birnie E; Verkerk MA; Lucassen AM; Ranchor AV; Van Langen IM
    Genet Med; 2015 Aug; 17(8):668-78. PubMed ID: 25503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When do genetic researchers have a duty to recontact study participants?
    Wade CH; Kalfoglou AL
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):26-7; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?
    Steinsbekk KS; Solberg B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Oct; 132(19):2190-3. PubMed ID: 23243670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics in population-based genetic research.
    DeCamp M; Sugarman J
    Account Res; 2004; 11(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 15341044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
    Affleck P
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 19332574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
    Fernandez CV; Weijer C
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.